Feasibility of intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring during tethered cord surgery in infants younger than 12 months

Purpose Feasibility, reliability, and safety assessment of transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in infants less than 12 months of age. Methods A total of 22 patients with a mean age of 33 (range 13–49) weeks that underwent neurosurgery for tethered cord were investigated. Data from intraoperative MEPs, anesthesia protocols, and clinical records were reviewed. Anesthesia during surgery was maintained by total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Results MEPs were present in all patients for the upper extremities and in 21 out of 22 infants for the lower extremities. Mean baseline stimulation intensity was 101 ± 20 mA. If MEPs were present at the end of surgery, no new motor deficit occurred. In the only case of MEP loss, preoperative paresis was present, and high baseline intensity thresholds were needed. MEP monitoring did not lead to any complications. TIVA was maintained with an average propofol infusion rate of 123.5 ± 38.2 µg/kg/min and 0.46 ± 0.17 µg/kg/min for remifentanil. Conclusion In spinal cord release surgery, the use of intraoperative MEP monitoring is indicated regardless of the patient’s age. We could demonstrate the feasibility and safety of MEP monitoring in infants if an adequate anesthetic regimen is applied. More data is needed to verify whether an irreversible loss of robust MEPs leads to motor deficits in this young age group.

Improved potential quality of intraoperative transcranial motor-evoked potentials by navigated electrode placement compared to the conventional ten-twenty system

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (tcMEPs) may fail to produce a serviceable signal due to displacements by mass lesions. We hypothesize that navigated placement of stimulation electrodes yields superior potential quality for tcMEPs compared to the conventional 10–20 placement. We prospectively included patients undergoing elective cranial surgery with intraoperative monitoring of tcMEPs. In addition to electrode placement as per the 10–20 system, an electrode pair was placed at a location corresponding to the hand knob area of the primary motor cortex (M1) for every patient, localized by a navigation system during surgical setup. Twenty-five patients undergoing elective navigated surgery for intracranial tumors (n = 23; 92%) or vascular lesions (n = 2; 8%) under intraoperative monitoring of tcMEPs were included between June and August 2019 at our department. Stimulation and recording of tcMEPs was successful in every case for the navigated electrode pair, while stimulation by 10–20 electrodes did not yield baseline tcMEPs in two cases (8%) with anatomical displacement of the M1. While there was no significant difference between baseline amplitudes, mean potential quality decreased significantly by 88.3 µV (− 13.5%) for the 10–20 electrodes (p = 0.004) after durotomy, unlike for the navigated electrodes (− 28.6 µV [− 3.1%]; p = 0.055). For patients with an anatomically displaced M1, the navigated tcMEPs declined significantly less after durotomy (− 3.6% vs. 10–20: − 23.3%; p = 0.038). Navigated placement of tcMEP electrodes accounts for interindividual anatomical variance and pathological dislocation of the M1, yielding more consistent potentials and reliable potential quality.