Anthropometry in Forensic Medicine and Forensic Science-'Forensic Anthropometry'

Bilim insanlarının kendi alanlarındaki gelişmeleri izlemeleri kadar, yapmış oldukları araştırmaları diğer araştırmacılarla paylaşmaları da önemlidir. Uzun zaman alan ve yoğun emek ürünü olan bilimsel çalışmaların sonuçlarmı, bilim insanları ile paylaşmak ve kalıcılığını sağlamak açısından en doğru yol uluslararası kabul gören seçkin dergilerde yayınlamaktır. Bu çalışmada; 2000-2004 yılları arasındaki 5 yıllık süreçte, ülkemizdeki adli tıp uzman ve asistanlarının katkılarıyla yapılan uluslararası yayınları TUBITAK-Uluslararası Bilimsel Yayınları Teşvik Programı ölçütlerine göre değerlendirmek ve bu yayınların Türkiye adresli Science Citation Index - Journal Citation Reports kapsamındaki yayınlara katkısını araştırmak amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, “Pubmed” ve “Web of Science” veri tabanlarından yararlanılmıştır. 01.01.2000 - 31.12.2004 tarihleri arasındaki 5 yıllık sürede, Web of Science veri tabanı kapsamındaki dergilerde, yazarları içinde ülkemizden adli tıp alanında çalışanların bulunduğu toplam 86 yayın yapılmıştır. Türkiye kaynaklı tüm yayınlara olan katkı oranı, son iki yılda binde 1.1’den binde 2.3’e yükselmiştir. Yayınların 70’inin (%81.4) tam makale, 15’inin (%17.4) tam makale dışı olduğu saptanmıştır. TÜBİTAK-Uluslararası Bilimsel Yayınları Teşvik Programı ölçütlerine göre, yayınların 3’ü (%3.5) A Grubu, 54’ü (%62.8) B Grubu, 23’ü (%26.7) C Grubu dergi listelerinde yer almaktadır. Yazar sayısı 4 ve daha fazla olan yayınlar, toplam yayınların %79.1’i oluşturmaktadır. Forensic Science International, 24 (%27.9) yayınla en fazla yayının yapıldığı dergi olup adli tıp alanındaki dergilerde (Forensic Science International, American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, Journal of Forensic Sciences, International Journal of Legal Medicine) yapılan yaymlar toplam yayınların %39.5’ini oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmanın, adli tıp alanmdaki uluslararası yayınların geliştirilmesine katkıda bulunacağı düşünülmüştür.Anahtar kelimeler: Adli tıp, Science Citation Index, Türkiye

Download Full-text

Webster, Prof. James Mathewson, (1898–17 Nov. 1973), lately Director, West Midland Forensic Science Laboratory, Birmingham. Home Office; Professor of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Birmingham University

10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u160802 ◽

2007 ◽

Keyword(s):

Forensic Science ◽

Forensic Medicine ◽

Science Laboratory ◽

Home Office

Download Full-text

Gusterson, Prof. Barry Austin, (born 24 Oct. 1946), Professor of Pathology, 2000, Head of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Science, 2006, and Project Director for the Beatson Translational Research Centre, 2008, University of Glasgow (Chairman, Division of Cancer Sciences and Molecular Pathology, 2002–07)

10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u18440 ◽

2007 ◽

Keyword(s):

Translational Research ◽

Forensic Science ◽

Forensic Medicine ◽

Molecular Pathology ◽

Research Centre ◽

Project Director

Download Full-text

Dismantling the justice silos: Flowcharting the role and expertise of forensic science, forensic medicine and allied health in adult sexual assault investigations

Forensic Science International ◽

10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.01.015 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 285 ◽

pp. 21-28 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Sally F. Kelty ◽

Roberta Julian ◽

Eva Bruenisholz ◽

Linzi Wilson-Wilde

Keyword(s):

Sexual Assault ◽

Forensic Science ◽

Forensic Medicine ◽

Allied Health ◽

Adult Sexual Assault

Download Full-text

International Arab Forensic Science and Forensic Medicine Conference: ASFSFM 2015 Report

Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences and Forensic Medicine ◽

10.12816/0017707 ◽

2015 ◽

Author(s):

Abdul Rauf Chaudhary ◽

◽

Abdulsallam Bakdash ◽

Keyword(s):

Forensic Science ◽

Forensic Medicine

Download Full-text

Gusterson, Prof. Barry Austin, (born 24 Oct. 1946), Professor of Pathology, 2000–10, now Emeritus, Head of Forensic Medicine and Forensic Science, 2006–10, and Project Director for the Beatson Translational Research Centre, 2008–10, University of Glasgow (Chairman, Division of Cancer Sciences and Molecular Pathology, 2002–07)

10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.18440 ◽

2007 ◽

Keyword(s):

Translational Research ◽

Forensic Science ◽

Forensic Medicine ◽

Molecular Pathology ◽

Research Centre ◽

Project Director

Download Full-text

Scientometric evaluation of highly cited scientists in the field of forensic science and legal medicine

International Journal of Legal Medicine ◽

10.1007/s00414-020-02491-x ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Alan Wayne Jones

Keyword(s):

Forensic Science ◽

Forensic Medicine ◽

Scientific Discipline ◽

Research Field ◽

Legal Medicine ◽

H Index ◽

Elite Group ◽

Subject Category ◽

Scopus Database ◽

Highly Cited

AbstractA publically available database of the most highly cited scientists in all disciplines was used to identify people that belonged to the subject category “forensic science and legal medicine.” This bibliometric information was derived from Elsevier’s SCOPUS database containing eight million scientists with at least five articles as author or co-author. The top 100,000 most highly cited scientists were identified and ranked according to six citation metrics; total number of citations, H-index, H-index adjusted for co-authorship, citations to single-authored papers, citations to single or first author papers and, citations to single, first, or last-authored papers. The eight million entries in the SCOPUS database were sub-divided into 22 main subject categories and 176 sub-categories, one of which was legal and forensic medicine. The citation databases were provided as supplementary material in two articles published in PLoS Biology in 2019 and 2020. Among the top 100,000 most highly cited scientists, there were only 30 allocated to the legal and forensic medicine category, according to the 2019 PLoS Biology article. The updated database from 2020 also included the names of people within the top-cited 2% of their scientific discipline. This increased the number of forensic practitioners to 215 from a total of 10,158 individuals in this subject category. This article takes a closer look at these highly cited forensic scientists, the countries where they work, the particular research field in which they publish, and their composite citation scores with and without self-citations. The top ten most cited individuals in both databases (2019 and 2020) were the same and these should therefore be considered an elite group among all forensic practitioners.

Download Full-text