PRIMARY TUBERCULOSIS OF THE VERMIFORM APPENDIX

1955 ◽  
Vol 1 (21) ◽  
pp. 756-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F. Rose
1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 655-661
Author(s):  
J. Fernando Val-Bernal ◽  
Carmen Gonzalez-Vela ◽  
M. Francisca Garijo
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-42
Author(s):  
Chun Han ◽  
◽  
Ji Hoon Kim ◽  
Soon Hee Jung ◽  
Jeong Pyo Bong ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam O’Connor ◽  
Peter Asaad

Abstract De Garengeot hernia is a rare subtype of femoral hernia whereby the vermiform appendix is located within the hernial sac. Even rarer is the presence of appendicitis within the hernia sac. De Garengeot’s hernia is difficult to diagnose pre-operatively and can prove technically difficult at operation particularly with regards to mobilization of the caecum and appendix in order to perform appendicectomy. Laparoscopic, open, with and without mesh repair of de Garengeot hernia have all been described in the literature with varying degrees of success. We present a case of an 82 year old lady presenting with an acutely painful right sided groin lump. CT scan revealed the presence of de Garengeot hernia with acute appendicitis. We describe in text and photo format our approach to the hernia repair, appendicectomy and provide a short review of the literature with regards to the different operative approaches to such a patient.


1925 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 86-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Brown ◽  
K. McK. Doig
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Ming Li Chia ◽  
Shaun Wen Yang Chan ◽  
Vishal G. Shelat

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Diverticular disease of the vermiform appendix (DDA) has an incidence of 0.004 to 2.1% in appendicectomy specimens. DDA is variably associated with perforation and malignancy. We report a single-center experience of DDA. The primary aim is to validate the association of DDA with complicated appendicitis or malignancy, and the secondary aim is to validate systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria and quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scores. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The histopathology reports of 2,305 appendicectomy specimens from January 2011 to December 2015 were reviewed. Acute appendicitis was found in 2,164 (93.9%) specimens. Histology of the remaining 141 (6.1%) patients revealed: normal appendix (<i>n</i> = 110), DDA (<i>n</i> = 22), endometriosis of appendix (<i>n</i> = 6), and an absent appendix (<i>n</i> = 3). Patient demographics, clinical profile, operative data, and perioperative outcomes of DDA patients are studied. Modified Alvarado score, Andersson score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA scores were retrospectively calculated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The incidence of DDA was 0.95%. Ten patients (45.5%) had diverticulitis. The mean age of DDA patients was 39.5 years (range 23–87), with male preponderance (<i>n</i> = 12, 54.5%). The median Modified Alvarado score was 8 (range 4–9), and the median Andersson score was 5 (range 2–8). Fourteen patients (63.6%) had SIRS, and none had a high qSOFA score. Eight patients (36.4%) had complicated appendicitis (perforation [<i>n</i> = 2] or abscess [<i>n</i> = 6]). Eleven (50%) patients underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy. There were three 30-day readmissions and no mortality. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> DDA is a distinct clinical pathology associated with complicated appendicitis.


2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (7) ◽  
pp. 638-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Kallenbach ◽  
Sofie Vetli Hjorth ◽  
Ulla Engel ◽  
Nis Hallundbæk Schlesinger ◽  
Susanne Holck

AimTo assess the prevalence of acquired diverticulum of the appendix (DA), including incipient forms and its possible significance as a marker of local/regional neoplasms.Materials and MethodsThe pathology database at Hvidovre Hospital was searched for appendix specimens, received between 2001 and 2010, coded for DA or for a space-occupying lesion. Slides were reviewed to determine DA status and the nature of lesions possibly causing DA.ResultAmong 4413 appendix specimens, DA were identified in 39 (0.9%, CI 0.6% to 1.2%) cases, 17 (43.6%, 28.0% to 59.2%) of which additionally harboured an appendiceal neoplasm/neoplastic precursor, whereas this figure was 1.2% (CI 0.9% to 1.6%) for non-DA specimens (p<0.0001). Six of the 39 DA specimens comprised incipient DA, three of which coexisted with appendiceal neoplasms. In addition, local/regional non-neoplastic lesions (six cases) and colorectal carcinomas (four cases) coexisted with DA.ConclusionDA has significance as a putative marker of local/regional neoplasms. Therefore, a DA specimen proved significantly more likely to harbour a neoplastic growth than a non-DA counterpart. Submission for microscopy of the entire DA specimen, whether transmural or only incipient, and a comment in the pathology report on the occasional concurrence of local/regional neoplasms in this setting seem appropriate. The observation of DA may thus provide a valuable contribution in the diagnostic process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document