scholarly journals Prevention of Pulmonary Edema after Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery with Mini-Thoracotomy Using Neutrophil Elastase Inhibitor

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoshi Yamashiro ◽  
Ryoko Arakaki ◽  
Yuya Kise ◽  
Yukio Kuniyoshi
Perfusion ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Micaela De Palo ◽  
Pietro Guida ◽  
Florinda Mastro ◽  
Daniela Nanna ◽  
Teresa A.P. Quagliara ◽  
...  

Background: Myocardial damage is an independent predictor of adverse outcome following cardiac surgery and myocardial protection is one of the key factors to achieve successful outcomes. Cardioplegia with Custodiol is currently the most used cardioplegia during minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). Different randomized controlled trials compared blood and Custodiol cardioplegia in the context of traditional cardiac surgery. No data are available for MICS. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of cold blood versus Custodiol cardioplegia during MICS. Method: We retrospectively evaluated 90 patients undergoing MICS through a right mini-thoracotomy in a three-year period. Myocardial protection was performed using cold blood (44 patients, CBC group) or Custodiol (46 patients, Custodiol group) cardioplegia, based on surgeon preference and complexity of surgery. Results: The primary outcomes were post-operative cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and creatine kinase MB (CKMB) serum release and the incidence of Low Cardiac Output Syndrome (LCOS). Aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were higher in the Custodiol group. No difference was observed in myocardial injury enzyme release (peak cTnI value was 18±46 ng/ml in CBC and 21±37 ng/ml in Custodiol; p=0.245). No differences were observed for mortality, LCOS, atrial or ventricular arrhythmias onset, transfusions, mechanical ventilation time duration, intensive care unit and total hospital stay. Conclusions: Custodiol and cold blood cardioplegic solutions seem to assure similar myocardial protection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery through a right mini-thoracotomy approach.


2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 500-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Irisawa ◽  
Arudo Hiraoka ◽  
Toshinori Totsugawa ◽  
Genta Chikazawa ◽  
Kosuke Nakajima ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadeen Habib Khalil ◽  
Rebecca Anders ◽  
Anna Flo Forner ◽  
Matthias Gutberlet ◽  
Joerg Ender

2020 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. e375-e377
Author(s):  
Koichi Inoue ◽  
Arudo Hiraoka ◽  
Genta Chikazawa ◽  
Toshinori Totsugawa ◽  
Kosuke Nakajima ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayse Cetinkaya ◽  
Mohamed Zeriouh ◽  
Oliver-Joannis Liakopoulos ◽  
Stefan Hein ◽  
Tamor Siemons ◽  
...  

Abstract Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) via right lateral mini thoracotomy is the gold standard treatment approach for mitral and tricuspid valve disorders. Other selected procedures (e.g. transapical aortic valve implantation, MIDCAB) require a left lateral mini thoracotomy for surgical access. Advantages of MICS over complete sternotomy are well known, but access-related complications post MICS, such as pulmonary herniation, are often underestimated/overlooked. In males, a pulmonary herniation in the proximity of the former thoracotomy is often clinically visible, especially when the intrathoracic pressure rises (e.g. during coughing). In females, clinical symptoms may be hidden by the breast and patients often have unspecific complaints or occasional pain when coughing, making identification of a lung herniation more difficult. Chest computed tomography is the diagnostic tool of choice for pulmonary herniations. Using a series of 20 patients with pulmonary herniation post MICS, we report our findings in diagnosis and treatment of this condition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document