scholarly journals On the translation functors for a semisimple algebraic group.

1982 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 217 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Koppinen
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Group ◽  
Semisimple Algebraic Group

An Explicit Cell Decomposition of the Wonderful Compactification of a Semisimple Algebraic Group

2003 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lex E. Renner
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Group ◽  
Cell Decomposition ◽  
Bruhat Decomposition ◽  
Semisimple Algebraic Group ◽  
Reductive Monoid

AbstractWe determine an explicit cell decomposition of the wonderful compactification of a semisimple algebraic group. To do this we first identify the B × B-orbits using the generalized Bruhat decomposition of a reductive monoid. From there we show how each cell is made up from B × B orbits.

scholarly journals Hopf-theoretic approach to motives of twisted flag varieties

2021 ◽  
Vol 157 (5) ◽  
pp. 963-996
Author(s):  
Victor Petrov ◽  
Nikita Semenov
Keyword(s):  
Hopf Algebra ◽  
Algebraic Group ◽  
Cohomology Theory ◽  
Algebra Structure ◽  
Flag Varieties ◽  
Theoretic Approach ◽  
Hopf Algebra Structure ◽  
Uniform Approach ◽  
Semisimple Algebraic Group ◽  
Oriented Cohomology

Let $G$ be a split semisimple algebraic group over a field and let $A^*$ be an oriented cohomology theory in the Levine–Morel sense. We provide a uniform approach to the $A^*$ -motives of geometrically cellular smooth projective $G$ -varieties based on the Hopf algebra structure of $A^*(G)$ . Using this approach, we provide various applications to the structure of motives of twisted flag varieties.

Smoothness of Quotients Associated With a Pair of Commuting Involutions

2004 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 945-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aloysius G. Helminck ◽  
Gerald W. Schwarz
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Point ◽  
Algebraic Group ◽  
Symmetric Case ◽  
Closed Field ◽  
Categorical Quotient ◽  
Algebraically Closed Field ◽  
Semisimple Algebraic Group ◽  
Point Groups

AbstractLet σ, θ be commuting involutions of the connected semisimple algebraic group G where σ, θ and G are defined over an algebraically closed field , char = 0. Let H := Gσ and K := Gθ be the fixed point groups. We have an action (H × K) × G → G, where ((h, k), g) ⟼ hgk–1, h ∈ H, k ∈ K, g ∈ G. Let G//(H × K) denote the categorical quotient Spec (G)H×K. We determine when this quotient is smooth. Our results are a generalization of those of Steinberg [Ste75], Pittie [Pit72] and Richardson [Ric82] in the symmetric case where σ = θ and H = K.

scholarly journals A counter-example by Yagita

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 2050025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikita A. Karpenko
Keyword(s):  
Algebraic Group ◽  
Flag Variety ◽  
Arbitrary Characteristic ◽  
Semisimple Algebraic Group ◽  
Counter Example ◽  
Spinor Group ◽  
Algebraic Cobordism

According to a 2018 preprint by Nobuaki Yagita, the conjecture on a relationship between [Formula: see text]- and Chow theories for a generically twisted flag variety of a split semisimple algebraic group [Formula: see text], due to the author, fails for [Formula: see text] the spinor group [Formula: see text]. Yagita’s tools include a Brown–Peterson version of algebraic cobordism, ordinary and connective Morava [Formula: see text]-theories, as well as Grothendieck motives related to various cohomology theories over fields of characteristic [Formula: see text]. We provide a proof using only the [Formula: see text]- and Chow theories themselves and extend the (slightly modified) example to arbitrary characteristic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document