scholarly journals Peer Review #2 of "Data quantity is more important than its spatial bias for predictive species distribution modelling (v0.1)"

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Peer Review ◽  
Species Distribution ◽  
Species Distribution Modelling ◽  
Spatial Bias ◽  
Distribution Modelling

scholarly journals Data quantity is more important than its spatial bias for predictive species distribution modelling

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willson Gaul ◽  
Dinara Sadykova ◽  
Hannah J. White ◽  
Lupe León-Sánchez ◽  
Paul Caplat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Species Distribution ◽  
Species Distribution Model ◽  
Species Distribution Modelling ◽  
Prediction Performance ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Spatial Bias ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Distribution Modelling ◽  
Modelling Method

ABSTRACTBiological records are often the data of choice for training predictive species distribution models (SDMs), but spatial sampling bias is pervasive in biological records data at multiple spatial scales and is thought to impair the performance of SDMs. We simulated presences and absences of virtual species as well as the process of recording these species to evaluate the effect on species distribution model prediction performance of 1) spatial bias in training data, 2) sample size (the average number of observations per species), and 3) the choice of species distribution modelling method. Our approach is novel in quantifying and applying real-world spatial sampling biases to simulated data. Spatial bias in training data decreased species distribution model prediction performance, but only when the bias was relatively strong. Sample size and the choice of modelling method were more important than spatial bias in determining the prediction performance of species distribution models.

scholarly journals Data quantity is more important than its spatial bias for predictive species distribution modelling

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e10411
Author(s):  
Willson Gaul ◽  
Dinara Sadykova ◽  
Hannah J. White ◽  
Lupe Leon-Sanchez ◽  
Paul Caplat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Species Distribution ◽  
Species Distribution Model ◽  
Species Distribution Modelling ◽  
Prediction Performance ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Distribution Model ◽  
Spatial Bias ◽  
Distribution Models ◽  
Distribution Modelling ◽  
Modelling Method

Biological records are often the data of choice for training predictive species distribution models (SDMs), but spatial sampling bias is pervasive in biological records data at multiple spatial scales and is thought to impair the performance of SDMs. We simulated presences and absences of virtual species as well as the process of recording these species to evaluate the effect on species distribution model prediction performance of (1) spatial bias in training data, (2) sample size (the average number of observations per species), and (3) the choice of species distribution modelling method. Our approach is novel in quantifying and applying real-world spatial sampling biases to simulated data. Spatial bias in training data decreased species distribution model prediction performance, but sample size and the choice of modelling method were more important than spatial bias in determining the prediction performance of species distribution models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document