Nonparametric procedure for identifying effective and safe doses with ordinal response data

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1575-1584
Author(s):  
Seonhui Kim ◽  
Dongjae Kim
Keyword(s):  
Response Data ◽  
Ordinal Response ◽  
Nonparametric Procedure

A mixed-effects regression model for three-level ordinal response data

2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (21) ◽  
pp. 3331-3345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rema Raman ◽  
Donald Hedeker
Keyword(s):  
Regression Model ◽  
Mixed Effects ◽  
Response Data ◽  
Ordinal Response

scholarly journals Modeling Paired Ordinal Response Data

2004 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-68
Author(s):  
Anoshiravan Kazemnejad ◽  
Farid Zayeri ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Response Data ◽  
Ordinal Response

POPULATION-AVERAGED AND CLUSTER-SPECIFIC MODELS FOR CLUSTERED ORDINAL RESPONSE DATA

1996 ◽  
Vol 15 (23) ◽  
pp. 2573-2588 ◽  
Author(s):  
THOMAS R. TEN HAVE ◽  
J. RICHARD LANDIS ◽  
JONATHAN HARTZEL
Keyword(s):  
Response Data ◽  
Ordinal Response

The Use of Questionnaire Data in Presence Studies: Do Not Seriously Likert

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 447-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mel Slater ◽  
Maia Garau
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Virtual Environment ◽  
Statistical Methods ◽  
Behavioral Data ◽  
Questionnaire Data ◽  
Virtual Characters ◽  
Response Data ◽  
Ordinal Response ◽  
Immersive Virtual Environment

The problems of valid design of questionnaires and analysis of ordinal response data from questionnaires have had a long history in the psychological and social sciences. Gardner and Martin (2007, this issue) illustrate some of these problems with reference to an earlier paper (Garau, Slater, Pertaub, & Razzaque, 2005) that studied copresence with virtual characters within an immersive virtual environment. Here we review the critique of Gardner and Martin supporting their main arguments. However, we show that their critique could not take into account the historical circumstances of the experiment described in the paper, and moreover that a reanalysis using more appropriate statistical methods does not result in conclusions that are different from those reported in the original paper. We go on to argue that in general such questionnaire data is treated far too seriously, and that a different paradigm is needed for presence research—one where multivariate physiological and behavioral data is used alongside subjective and questionnaire data, with the latter not having any specially privileged role.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document