beagle 2
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

66
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-178
Author(s):  
Teodora Kuzmanova ◽  
Nick Higgett ◽  
Mark Sims ◽  
Eric Tatham ◽  
Jim Clemmet
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teodora Kuzmanova ◽  
Nick Higgett ◽  
Mark W Sims ◽  
Jim Clemmet ◽  
Eric Tatham
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 170785 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. C. Bridges ◽  
J. Clemmet ◽  
M. Croon ◽  
M. R. Sims ◽  
D. Pullan ◽  
...  

The 2003 Beagle 2 Mars lander has been identified in Isidis Planitia at 90.43° E, 11.53° N, close to the predicted target of 90.50° E, 11.53° N. Beagle 2 was an exobiology lander designed to look for isotopic and compositional signs of life on Mars, as part of the European Space Agency Mars Express (MEX) mission. The 2004 recalculation of the original landing ellipse from a 3-sigma major axis from 174 km to 57 km, and the acquisition of Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) imagery at 30 cm per pixel across the target region, led to the initial identification of the lander in 2014. Following this, more HiRISE images, giving a total of 15, including red and blue-green colours, were obtained over the area of interest and searched, which allowed sub-pixel imaging using super high-resolution techniques. The size (approx. 1.5 m), distinctive multilobed shape, high reflectivity relative to the local terrain, specular reflections, and location close to the centre of the planned landing ellipse led to the identification of the Beagle 2 lander. The shape of the imaged lander, although to some extent masked by the specular reflections in the various images, is consistent with deployment of the lander lid and then some or all solar panels. Failure to fully deploy the panels—which may have been caused by damage during landing—would have prohibited communication between the lander and MEX and commencement of science operations. This implies that the main part of the entry, descent and landing sequence, the ejection from MEX, atmospheric entry and parachute deployment, and landing worked as planned with perhaps only the final full panel deployment failing.


2015 ◽  
pp. 252-253
Author(s):  
Frances Westall
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Frances Westall
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document