recurrent meningioma
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

76
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii50-ii50
Author(s):  
G E Richardson ◽  
M A Mustafa ◽  
C S Gillespie ◽  
S M Keshwara ◽  
B A Taweel ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Meningioma is the commonest primary brain tumour. Despite surgery, meningiomas can recur. Surgery is usually the first line treatment for recurrent meningioma. The aim was to determine the risk factors associated with clinical outcomes (performance status, morbidity, mortality, recurrence) following re-operation for recurrence of intracranial meningioma. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective cohort study (1998–2018). Eligible patients had reoperation for local recurrence of a previously operated meningioma. Collected data included baseline clinical and imaging characteristic. Primary outcome measure was performance status after each reoperation. Secondary outcome measures were medical and surgical morbidity, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Fifty-eight patients were eligible (37 female, mean age at 1st re-operation 56.1 years (SD=11.6)). Eleven patients (19.6%) had 2 re-operations and 3 patients (5.4%) had 3 re-operations. Median follow up was 128.5 months (IQR=73–194.5). Median time to 1st recurrence and 1st re-operation were 36.5 (IQR=24.3–81.0) and 43.8 months (IQR=20.3–103.4), respectively. Fifteen patients (26.8%) had worse performance status after 1st reoperation, compared to 5.4% (n=3) after the primary operation. Complication rate was 32.1% (n=18) after the primary operation compared to 48.2% (n=27) after 1st reoperation. At primary operation, there were 29 (51.8%) grade 1, 24 (42.9%) grade 2, and 1 (1.8%) grade 3 tumours. Median RFS after first re-operation was 36.5 months (95% CI 29.3–43.9). Median OS was 312 months (95 % CI 257.8–366.2). Increased number of post-operative complications were a risk factor for worsened performance status following reoperation (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.1–4.6], P=0.029). CONCLUSION Re-operation is associated with a worse performance status and increased risk of complications. Re-operating meningiomas for radiological recurrence without symptoms increases patient morbidity. Shared-care management decision should be made with patients when considering operating for radiological recurrence only.


2020 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 261-261
Author(s):  
Satvik Khaddar ◽  
Arti Bhelekar ◽  
Ochin Dale ◽  
Litty Varghese ◽  
Vijay Maruti Patil
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 467-470
Author(s):  
Neeraj Salhotra ◽  
Sheikhan Al Hashmi ◽  
Aml Eid Mohammad Saleh ◽  
Mahmood Marhoon Al Hatalli ◽  
Simin Laiq ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thais S. Sabedot ◽  
Tathiane M. Malta ◽  
James Snyder ◽  
Tobias Walbert ◽  
Ian Lee ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
pp. 1447-1455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia L. Dalle Ore ◽  
Stephen T. Magill ◽  
Adam J. Yen ◽  
Maryam N. Shahin ◽  
David S. Lee ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEExtracranial meningioma metastases are uncommon, occurring in less than 1% of patients diagnosed with meningioma. Due to the rarity of meningioma metastases, patients are not routinely screened for distant disease. In this series, we report their experience with meningioma metastases and results of screening for metastases in select patients with recurrent meningiomas.METHODSAll patients undergoing resection or stereotactic radiosurgery for primary or recurrent meningioma from 2009 to 2017 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who were diagnosed with or underwent imaging to evaluate for systemic metastases. Imaging to evaluate for metastases was performed with CT scanning of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis or whole-body PET/CT using either FDG or 68Ga-DOTA-octreotate (DOTATATE) tracers in 28 patients. Indications for imaging were symptomatic lesions concerning for metastasis or asymptomatic screening in patients with greater than 2 recurrences being evaluated for additional treatment.RESULTSOf 1193 patients treated for meningioma, 922 (77.3%) patients had confirmed or presumed WHO grade I tumors, 236 (19.8%) had grade II tumors, and 35 (2.9%) had grade III tumors. Mean follow-up was 4.3 years. A total of 207 patients experienced recurrences (17.4%), with a mean of 1.8 recurrences. Imaging for metastases was performed in 28 patients; 1 metastasis was grade I (3.6%), 16 were grade II (57.1%), and 11 were grade III (39.3%). Five patients (17.9%) underwent imaging because of symptomatic lesions. Of the 28 patients screened, 27 patients had prior recurrent meningioma (96.4%), with a median of 3 recurrences. On imaging, 10 patients had extracranial lesions suspicious for metastasis (35.7%). At biopsy, 8 were meningioma metastases, 1 was a nonmeningioma malignancy, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up prior to biopsy. Biopsy-confirmed metastases occurred in the liver (5), lung (3), mediastinum (1), and bone (1). The observed incidence of metastases was 0.67% (n = 8). Incidence increased to 2% of WHO grade II and 8.6% of grade III meningiomas. Using the proposed indications for screening, the number needed to screen to identify one patient with biopsy-confirmed malignancy was 3.83.CONCLUSIONSSystemic imaging of patients with multiply recurrent meningioma or symptoms concerning for metastasis may identify extracranial metastases in a significant proportion of patients and can inform decision making for additional treatments.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 552-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Graillon ◽  
Marc Sanson ◽  
Chantal Campello ◽  
Ahmed Idbaih ◽  
Matthieu Peyre ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 145 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Guyot ◽  
Mathilde Duchesne ◽  
Sandrine Robert ◽  
Anne-Sophie Lia ◽  
Paco Derouault ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document