The efficacy of natural selection in producing optimal sex ratio adjustments in a fig wasp species

Ever since Darwin's discovery of natural selection, we expect traits to evolve to increase organisms' fitness. As a result, we can use optimization models to make a priori predictions of phenotypic variation, even when selection is frequency-dependent. A notable example is the prediction of female-biased sex ratios resulting from local mate competition (LMC) and inbreeding. LMC models incorporate the effects of LMC and inbreeding. Fig wasp sex ratio adjustments fit LMC predictions well. However, the appropriateness of LMC models to fig wasps has been questioned, and the role that a coincidental by-product plays in creating the apparent fit has been clearly illustrated. Here, we show that the sex ratio adjustments of a fig wasp are the result of a dual mechanism. It consists of a standard facultative LMC response favoured by natural selection, as well as a mechanism that may be the result of selection, but that could also be a coincidental by-product. If it is a by-product, the fitness increase is coincidental and natural selection's role was limited to fine-tuning it for higher fitness returns. We further document a case of an apparent fitness-reducing sex ratio adjustment. We conclude that the use of the adaptationist approach demands that our understanding of traits must be remodelled continually to rectify spurious assumptions.

Sperm sex ratio adjustment in a mammal: perceived male competition leads to elevated proportions of female-producing sperm

Mammal sex allocation research has focused almost exclusively on maternal traits, but it is now apparent that fathers can also influence offspring sex ratios. Parents that produce female offspring under conditions of intense male–male competition can benefit with greater assurance of maximized grand-parentage. Adaptive adjustment in the sperm sex ratio, for example with an increase in the production of X-chromosome bearing sperm (CBS), is one potential paternal mechanism for achieving female-biased sex ratios. Here, we tested this mechanistic hypothesis by varying the risk of male–male competition that male house mice perceived during development, and quantifying sperm sex ratios at sexual maturity. Our analyses revealed that males exposed to a competitive ‘risk’ produced lower proportions of Y-CBS compared to males that matured under ‘no risk’ of competition. We also explored whether testosterone production was linked to sperm sex ratio variation, but found no evidence to support this. We discuss our findings in relation to the adaptive value of sperm sex ratio adjustments and the role of steroid hormones in socially induced sex allocation.