approximate bayesian inference
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

76
(FIVE YEARS 29)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Entropy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 1076
Author(s):  
Karl J. Friston ◽  
Lancelot Da Costa ◽  
Thomas Parr

Biehl et al. (2021) present some interesting observations on an early formulation of the free energy principle. We use these observations to scaffold a discussion of the technical arguments that underwrite the free energy principle. This discussion focuses on solenoidal coupling between various (subsets of) states in sparsely coupled systems that possess a Markov blanket—and the distinction between exact and approximate Bayesian inference, implied by the ensuing Bayesian mechanics.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivani Bathla ◽  
Vinita Vasudevan

<div>The complexity of inference using the belief propagation algorithms increases exponentially with the maximum clique size. We describe an approximate inference approach when there are clique size limitations due to memory constraints using incremental construction of clique trees.<br></div>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shivani Bathla ◽  
Vinita Vasudevan

<div>The complexity of inference using the belief propagation algorithms increases exponentially with the maximum clique size. We describe an approximate inference approach when there are clique size limitations due to memory constraints using incremental construction of clique trees.<br></div>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Buse M. Urgen ◽  
Huseyin Boyaci

AbstractThe effect of prior knowledge and expectations on perceptual and decision-making processes have been extensively studied. Yet, the computational mechanisms underlying those effects have been a controversial issue. Recently, using a recursive Bayesian updating scheme, unmet expectations have been shown to entail further computations, and consequently delay perceptual processes. Here we take a step further and model these empirical findings with a recurrent cortical model, which was previously suggested to approximate Bayesian inference (Heeger, 2017). Our model fitting results show that the cortical model can successfully predict the behavioral effects of expectation. That is, when the actual sensory input does not match with the expectations, the sensory process needs to be completed with additional, and consequently longer, computations. We suggest that this process underlies the delay in perceptual thresholds in unmet expectations. Overall our findings demonstrate that a parsimonious recurrent cortical model can explain the effects of expectation on sensory processes.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Palmí‐Perales ◽  
Virgilio Gómez‐Rubio ◽  
Gonzalo López‐Abente ◽  
Rebeca Ramis ◽  
José Miguel Sanz‐Anquela ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document