distal ureterectomy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

49
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1277-1278
Author(s):  
Christopher Pulford ◽  
Kevin Keating ◽  
Matthew Rohloff ◽  
David Peifer ◽  
Richard Eames ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. S139
Author(s):  
H. Ayerra Pérez ◽  
P. Arce Cuartango ◽  
R. Pinto Martín ◽  
N. Aranda Herrera ◽  
P. Abad-López ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-90
Author(s):  
Mahesh Bahadur Adhikari ◽  
Woon Chau Tsang ◽  
Ho Yee Tiong

Introduction: Kidney sparing surgery like endoscopic resection and distal ureterectomy has been recently proposed as alternative surgical options to manage distal Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer. This study aims to compare the surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of distal ureterectomy and Radical Nephroureterectomy for distal Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.  Methods and Material: Out of 57 patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma treated surgically at a single institution between 2010 and 2016, nineteen patients had distal Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. A retrospective review was performed on these 19 patients (11 Radical Nephroureterectomy and 8 distal ureterectomy). Radical Nephroureterectomy was performed using an open or laparoscopic approach (n= 4 and 7 respectively). All Distal Ureterectomy patients were performed via an open extra-peritoneal Gibson incision. Pelvic lymphadenectomy and Subsequent ureteroneocystostomy in the Distal Ureterectomy group was performed directly and was augmented by psoas hitch or using boari flap reconstruction. Demographic, clinical features and post-operative outcomes were compared between the Radical Nephroureterectomy and Distal Ureterectomy groups.  Results: There was a trend towards shorter mean duration of surgery (238±34 vs. 286 ±90 min) and length of hospital stay (LOS) (7.6±2.8 vs. 17.3±20.7 days) in the Distal Ureterectomy group compared to the Radical Nephroureterectomy group (P=NS). Peri-operative Complication of Clavien grade 1-2 was seen in 4(33.33%) Radical Nephroureterectomy and 3 (37.5%) Distal Ureterectomy cases respectively. All patients had high grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma with equivalent pTNM staging in both groups with clear surgical margins. Immediate post-operative renal function improvement was statistically significant in the Distal Ureterectomy group (Radical Nephroureterectomy 2.27±5.93 vs 10.86±9.92 Distal Ureterectomy, p=0.034). Three out of 11 Radical Nephroureterectomy group patients required dialysis.  Conclusions: Local recurrences were similar after Distal Ureterectomy and Radical Nephroureterectomy with equivalent pathological outcomes in distal Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. There was a clear trend towards shorter hospital stay and better renal function preservation in favor of Distal Ureterectomy with fewer patients requiring dialysis. 


2021 ◽  
pp. 039156032110104
Author(s):  
Furkan Umut Kilic ◽  
Uygar Micoogullari ◽  
Serkan Altinova

Introduction: Leiomyomas of the genitourinary tract are rare and their manifestation in the ureter is even rarer. To our knowledge, only 14 cases of leiomyoma of the ureter have been reported worldwide since 1955, therefore this case will be 15th. Case presentation: We present a rare case of primary leiomyoma of the right ureter. Ureteroscopy did not show any abnormal findings in the ureteral mucosa. The primary leiomyoma was resected with distal ureterectomy and partial cystectomy that was followed with ureteroneocystostomy due to extraluminal mass that caused hydronephrosis and back pain. Conclusion: Although rare, we believe that leiomyoma should be considered in the differential diagnoses of well-circumscribed ureteral masses and kidney-sparing surgery should be performed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. e280
Author(s):  
Eric Riedinger* ◽  
Kevin Reed ◽  
Wesley White
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document