laminar currents
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 1030-1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
S I Pinchuk ◽  
R G Shafikov ◽  
A B Sukhov


2006 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Dujardin
Keyword(s):  


2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Dujardin


2003 ◽  
Vol 325 (4) ◽  
pp. 745-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Dujardin
Keyword(s):  


1993 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Bedford ◽  
Mikhail Lyubich ◽  
John Smillie


Meccanica ◽  
1972 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-54
Author(s):  
I. Becchi ◽  
G. Seminara


1953 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 523-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dixon MacKinnon ◽  
William S. Hoar

Chum and coho salmon fry respond positively to changes in water flow by swimming against the current. The magnitude of the response varies with the intensity of the current. Currents eliciting optimum response differ for the two species. Both species respond to the stronger of two parallel laminar currents but, after a time, coho fail to discriminate between small differences while the chums move continuously into the greater flow. No evidence of adaptation is apparent in a two-hour period with rapid complex turbulences. In turbulent water coho fry make a sharper initial response than chum fry but do not seem to maintain the peak response over as wide a range of turbulences.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document