Bariatric Surgery in Super-Superobese Patients Maintains Metabolic Improvement Beyond The Failure in Expected Weight Loss.

Background Extreme obesity leads to increased health risks and perioperative complications. The results of bariatric surgery in patients with super-super obesity (SSO) are presented in this study. Methods From April 2008 to August 2019, 60 patients with SSO underwent bariatric surgery. Their weight loss and surgical outcome were analyzed. The mean follow-up time was 7.2 years. Results At baseline, the mean age was 41.5 years old, the mean BMI was 63.8 kg/m2, 80% of the patients suffered from co-morbidities, and 23.33% were revisional surgeries. Weight loss continued for up to two years after surgery. The percentage of EBW lost at two years was 62.27%, from two to five years: 61.48%, from five to 10 years: 36.82% and after ten years it was 31.89%, the differences in weight change over the time is significative (P<.001). The mean BMI at last visit (Mean 7.2 years) was 45.1 kg/m2 and 48.33% of the patients failed to lose at least 50% of EBW. Patients with fatty liver, diabetes, sleep apnea and hyperlipidemia had a remission or improvement in more than 70% of the cases. There were 5% perioperative complications, one perioperative death (1.67%) and other patient died in a motor vehicle accident, overall mortality 3.33%. Conclusion In the long term, almost half of the patients failed to lose 50% of their EBW. However, the metabolic effects of bariatric surgery were maintained during the follow-up time with a high remission of comorbidities. Revisional bariatric surgery increased the risk of mortality.

Title: Initial results of reoperative bariatric surgery: a retrospective feasibility and safety study at a low-volume unit

Background This study assessed the feasibility and results of revisional bariatric surgery at a low-volume unit.Methods This retrospective study was conducted from January 2017 to August 2020; the revision group comprised patients treated for weight regain (WR, n = 6), insufficient weight loss (IWL, n =3), and various complications (n=6). Clinical characteristics and 30-day outcomes were assessed and compared with those of primary bariatric procedures (control, n=173). Results A total of 8.0% (15/188) of patients underwent revisional procedures and tended to be elderly (40.1 vs. 38.2 years), be female (73.3% vs. 54.9%), and have a significantly lower body mass index (33.1 vs. 39.9 kg/m2) and fewer comorbidities than controls. Gastric bypass was the most prevalent revisional procedure. A significantly longer operative duration (155 and 96 min; p < 0.001), longer length of stay (3.7 and 2.4 days) and higher 30-day complication rate (20.0% vs. 4.6%) were found in the revision group, including one case of leakage and another of jejunojejunostomy obstruction. There were no cases of conversion to open surgery or mortality. A total of 5/6 WR patients achieved excessive weight loss >50%, versus only one IWL patient who reached this goal. Complications, including marginal ulcer, fistula and post-sleeve gastrectomy stenosis, were alleviated after revision.Conclusion Revisional surgery appears to be feasible and effective in a low-volume practice in patients with WR and complications after primary bariatric procedures; however, the benefits should be weighed against the risks. More robust evidence is required to support ongoing practice.