nonnative range
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

4
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2019 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Rosche ◽  
Isabell Hensen ◽  
Adrian Schaar ◽  
Uzma Zehra ◽  
Marie Jasieniuk ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 57-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Serhan Tarkan ◽  
Erdi G. Tepeköy ◽  
Uğur Karakuş ◽  
Nildeniz Top ◽  
Lorenzo Vilizzi

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 567-579
Author(s):  
Megan C. Sabal ◽  
Cyril J. Michel ◽  
Joseph M. Smith ◽  
Andrew Hampton ◽  
Sean A. Hayes

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt O. Reinhart ◽  
Wim H. Van der Putten ◽  
Tom Tytgat ◽  
Keith Clay

Existing theory for invasive nonnative species emphasizes the role of escaping specialist enemies. A useful approach is to reciprocally transplant enemies in a controlled and common experiment to quantify the interaction specificity of enemies from plant's native and nonnative ranges. Quantitative measures of interaction specificity, from two experiments with three host genotypes (Belgium, Louisiana, and Pennsylvania) and 37Pythiumisolates (10 Europe and 27 USA), revealed thatPythiumpathogens from populations ofPrunus serotinain its native range were not host genotype specific whilePythiumpathogens from its nonnative range vary with host genotype. This study provides empirical evidence suggesting thatPythiumfrom the nonnative range are either preadapted to or are actively adapting to this host. Although only for a single pathosystem, this study illustrates the importance of understanding enemy impact and host-specificity to assess whether an invader has escaped its natural enemies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document