list length effect
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Tyler M. Ensor ◽  
Dominic Guitard ◽  
Tamra J. Bireta ◽  
William E. Hockley ◽  
Aimée M. Surprenant

Memory ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 816-830
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Badham ◽  
Cora Whitney ◽  
Sumeet Sanghera ◽  
Elizabeth A. Maylor

2015 ◽  
Vol 85 ◽  
pp. 27-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Annis ◽  
Joshua Guy Lenes ◽  
Holly A. Westfall ◽  
Amy H. Criss ◽  
Kenneth J. Malmberg

Author(s):  
Katrina Sugrue ◽  
Deryn Strange ◽  
Harlene Hayne

Prior research using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm has shown that participants are more likely to report the critical lures when long lists are presented. In this experiment, we evaluated two potential explanations for this list-length effect. Ten-year-old children and adults studied 7- or 14-word lists. After recalling each list, participants were then asked to report any other words that they had thought about, but had not reported, during the recall phase. We found that long lists were more likely to activate the critical lure and that short lists did not facilitate source monitoring. On the basis of our findings, we conclude that, for both age groups, the list-length effect was due primarily to list-related differences in activation of the critical lure.


2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Dennis ◽  
Michael D. Lee ◽  
Angela Kinnell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document