Modernising the Constitution: British Territories and Foreign Relations Act: Part 2

Modernising the Constitution: British Territories and Foreign Relations Act: Part 2.

Modernising the Constitution: British Territories and Foreign Relations Act: Part 1

Modernising the Constitution: British Territories and Foreign Relations Act: Part 1.

Reviewer Acknowledgements for International Law Research, Vol. 10, No. 1

Reviewer Acknowledgements for International Law Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2021

Modernising the Constitution - A Government Act

Modernising the Constitution - A Government Act.

Modernising the Constitution – Quangos

Modernising the Constitution – Quangos.

Modernising the Constitution - A Courts Act

Modernising the Constitution - A Courts Act.

On the Restrictive Jurisdictional Immunity of AIIB in China

The jurisdictional immunity of international organizations is a necessity for them to independently perform their functions and achieve their purposes. Therefore, the international community generally grants absolute jurisdictional immunity to international organizations. China has always advocated the position of absolute jurisdictional immunity, however, in the AIIB Agreement and the Headquarters Agreement between China and AIIB, China turn to the view that AIIB only share restrictive jurisdictional immunity. The change of China’s opinion on AIIB is not only the result of the development of international organizations immunity, but also the result of AIIB’s functional necessity. The fact that AIIB only enjoys restrictive jurisdictional immunity in China makes AIIB possible to be sued in China’s domestic courts. If the eligible plaintiff bring a lawsuit against AIIB in China, the courts could handle the case in accordance with domestic laws, the AIIB Agreement and the Headquarters Agreement to alleviate the dilemma of China’s lack of international organization law.

Modernising the Constitution - A Parliament Act

Modernising the Constitution - A Parliament Act.

Research on the Legal Model of international Anti-Terrorism Coordination

Terrorism seriously endangers world peace and security. In order to achieve the goal of effectively combating international terrorism, we must promote the establishment of a multi-level model of anti-terrorism cooperation. The current legal models of international counter-terrorism cooperation mainly include global counter-terrorism cooperation, regional counter-terrorism cooperation and bilateral counter-terrorism cooperation. Global counter-terrorism cooperation led by the United Nations is the most important form of counter-terrorism cooperation. The UN has set up a Counter-terrorism Committee and a series of treaties. The United Nations demands that States should prevent and stop the financing of terrorist ACTS; Criminalizes any person or thing that, by any means, directly or indirectly, provides or raises funds for terrorist activities; (b) Immediately freeze the assets of individuals and entities that facilitate, finance or participate in terrorist ACTS; The provision of any funds and financial assets and related services to individuals and entities assisting, financing or participating in terrorist ACTS is prohibited. Regional counter-terrorism cooperation refers to the cooperation between geographically adjacent countries to combat terrorism, which is an important part of international counter-terrorism cooperation. The main regional anti-terrorism cooperation organizations are: Association of Southeast Asian Nations, South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, European Union, Organization of American States, Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Bilateral anti-terrorism cooperation refers to the cooperation between two parties in order to form a joint anti-terrorism force. Bilateral cooperation can be between states or between states and regional organizations. Bilateral cooperation in flexible and diverse forms is also an important form of counter-terrorism cooperation.

Modernising the Constitution - A Crown Act

Modernising the Constitution - A Crown Act.