Closing the gap. Report of the Carter Center Health Policy Consultation

JAMA ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 254 (10) ◽  
pp. 1355-1358 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. H. Foege
2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 362-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Browne ◽  
Rick Hayes ◽  
Deborah Gleeson

Author(s):  
A. V. Crewe

We have become accustomed to differentiating between the scanning microscope and the conventional transmission microscope according to the resolving power which the two instruments offer. The conventional microscope is capable of a point resolution of a few angstroms and line resolutions of periodic objects of about 1Å. On the other hand, the scanning microscope, in its normal form, is not ordinarily capable of a point resolution better than 100Å. Upon examining reasons for the 100Å limitation, it becomes clear that this is based more on tradition than reason, and in particular, it is a condition imposed upon the microscope by adherence to thermal sources of electrons.


2001 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 507-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob Baggott ◽  
David J Hunter

2008 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
BRYAN R. FINE
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
MARY ELLEN SCHNEIDER
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document