Emergence of Cheyne-Stokes Breathing After Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator Implant in a Patient With Mixed Sleep Apnea

2019 ◽  
Vol 145 (4) ◽  
pp. 389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen M. Sarber ◽  
Stacey L. Ishman ◽  
Reena Dhanda Patil
PEDIATRICS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (5) ◽  
pp. e20153663-e20153663 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Diercks ◽  
D. Keamy ◽  
T. B. Kinane ◽  
B. Skotko ◽  
A. Schwartz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982110234
Author(s):  
Phillip Huyett

Objective To examine the changes in measures of sleep apnea severity and hypoxemia on the first postoperative night following implantation of the hypoglossal nerve stimulator. Study Design This was a single-arm prospective cohort study. Setting A single academic sleep surgical practice. Methods Subjects with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea underwent implantation of the hypoglossal nerve stimulator (HGNS) and were discharged to home the same day as surgery. A single-night WatchPAT study was performed on the night immediately following surgery (PON 1) and was compared to baseline sleep testing. Results Twenty subjects who were an average of 58.6 ± 2.5 years old, were 25% female, and had a mean body mass index of 28.1 ± 0.9 kg/m2 completed the study. Mean O2 nadir at baseline was 79.6% ± 1.1% compared to 82.7% ± 0.9% ( P = .013) on PON 1. One patient demonstrated a >10% worsening in O2 nadir. Only 2 additional patients demonstrated a worsening in O2 nadir on PON 1, each by only 1 percentage point. Neither mean time spent below SpO2 88% nor oxygen desaturation index (ODI) worsened postoperatively (mean time spent below oxygen saturation of 88%, 27.8 ± 7.85 vs 11.2 ± 5.2, P = .03; mean ODI, 29.6 ± 5.2/h vs 21.0 ± 5.4/h, P = .10). Mean obstructive apnea hypopnea index (AHI) was no worse (40.6 ± 4.7/h to 28.7 ± 4.2/h, P = .02), with only 2 patients experiencing an obstructive AHI >20% more severe than baseline. Only 1 patient demonstrated a clinically meaningful increase in central AHI on PON 1. Conclusions Overall, AHI and measures of nocturnal hypoxemia are stable, if not improved, on PON 1 following HGNS implantation. These findings support the safety of same-day discharge following implantation of the hypoglossal nerve stimulator.


SLEEP ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A421-A421
Author(s):  
Hanna Hong ◽  
Joel Oster ◽  
Aarti Grover ◽  
Greg Schumaker ◽  
Richard Wein ◽  
...  

SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A332-A332
Author(s):  
Sarah Sussman ◽  
Ashwin Ananth ◽  
Elie Fares ◽  
Colin Huntley ◽  
Maurits Boon ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The remedē® system is a transvenous phrenic nerve stimulator used to treat central sleep apnea (CSA). It is a safe and effective implantable device that has demonstrated significant improvements in objective sleep and quality of life. While complex sleep apnea represents development of central sleep apnea during treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnea, and has been well-described in the literature, we present a novel case of predominantly central sleep apnea treated with phrenic nerve stimulation with augmentation of obstructive events thereafter. This patient is, at the time of submission, being evaluated for hypoglossal nerve stimulation. Report of case(s) A 63-year-old male patient with a past medical history of hypertension, atrial fibrillation, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, GERD, obesity, and prior pulmonary embolism presented to the sleep medicine clinic with complaints of difficulty initiating and maintaining sleep, snoring, multiple nocturnal awakenings, excessive daytime sleepiness, and physical fatigue. On exam, BMI was 30.4, and airway classification was Mallampati 4. Split night polysomnography revealed severe mixed sleep apnea with an overall apnea hypopnea index (AHI) of 58.6 and a central AHI of 53.8 per hour after successful PAP titration at 7 cm H2O. He underwent phrenic nerve stimulator implantation and activation without complications. Phrenic nerve stimulation titration study four months after activation showed a normal central AHI of 4.6 per hour at a therapeutic voltage of 1.6 to 1.9mA, but significantly worse OSA with obstructive AHI of 53.1. In follow up, he reported intolerance of CPAP due to significant nasal congestion as well as asthma. Presently, he is scheduled for drug induced sleep endoscopy to visualize airway obstruction and is being evaluated for Inspire hypoglossal nerve stimulation and nasal surgery. Conclusion The treatment of sleep apnea has recently evolved rapidly with the development of implantable devices to treat both central and obstructive sleep apnea. We present a novel case of the first known patient to be considered for dual nerve stimulation for sleep apnea. Further study needs to be done to determine the safety and efficacy of concurrent implantable devices for the simultaneous treatment of OSA and CSA. Support (if any):


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document