Hearing, Listening, and Understanding: Auditory Development in Infancy

Author(s):  
Anne Fernald
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-18
Author(s):  
Andrea Bell ◽  
K. Todd Houston

To ensure optimal auditory development for the acquisition of spoken language, children with hearing loss require early diagnosis, effective ongoing audiological management, well fit and maintained hearing technology, and appropriate family-centered early intervention. When these elements are in place, children with hearing loss can achieve developmental and communicative outcomes that are comparable to their hearing peers. However, for these outcomes to occur, clinicians—early interventionists, speech-language pathologists, and pediatric audiologists—must participate in a dynamic process that requires careful monitoring of countless variables that could impact the child's skill acquisition. This paper addresses some of these variables or “red flags,” which often are indicators of both minor and major issues that clinicians may encounter when delivering services to young children with hearing loss and their families.





1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haim Sohmer ◽  
Sharon Freeman


1983 ◽  
Vol 176 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Musan Huangfu ◽  
James C. Saunders




1999 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Farnsworth Diehl

The evaluation of software in the treatment of a language-learning disability requires analysis of both the technical and conceptual aspects of software development. The Earobics® program is reviewed with this dual purpose. The Earobics® program, as reported by the publisher, is an auditory development and phonics software program that is designed to provide auditory processing and phonemic awareness training. Considered first are the technical aspects of the program, including the program description, hardware requirements, and user friendliness. Next, the conceptual framework motivating the software development is assessed through an analysis of the six games that make up the program. These six games appear to be premised on a combination of auditory processing and phonological awareness principles, which are not necessarily compatible. Finally, the strengths and limitations of the program are examined for the developmental sequence presented in its games and utility of the game sequence in the reading acquisition process.



PLoS ONE ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. e18993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothy V. M. Bishop ◽  
Mike Anderson ◽  
Corinne Reid ◽  
Allison M. Fox


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
pp. 10-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jena McDaniel ◽  
Stephen Camarata

Purpose We review the evidence for attenuating visual input during intervention to enhance auditory development and ultimately improve spoken language outcomes in children with cochlear implants. Background Isolating the auditory sense is a long-standing tradition in many approaches for teaching children with hearing loss. However, the evidence base for this practice is surprisingly limited and not straightforward. We review four bodies of evidence that inform whether or not visual input inhibits auditory development in children with cochlear implants: (a) audiovisual benefits for speech perception and understanding for individuals with typical hearing, (b) audiovisual integration development in children with typical hearing, (c) sensory deprivation and neural plasticity, and (d) audiovisual processing in individuals with hearing loss. Conclusions Although there is a compelling theoretical rationale for reducing visual input to enhance auditory development, there is also a strong theoretical argument supporting simultaneous multisensory auditory and visual input to potentially enhance outcomes in children with hearing loss. Despite widespread and long-standing practice recommendations to limit visual input, there is a paucity of evidence supporting this recommendation and no evidence that simultaneous multisensory input is deleterious to children with cochlear implants. These findings have important implications for optimizing spoken language outcomes in children with cochlear implants.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document