“In your own words, how certain are you?” Post‐identification feedback distorts verbal and numeric expressions of eyewitness confidence

Author(s):  
Jillian M. Kenchel ◽  
Rachel L. Greenspan ◽  
Daniel Reisberg ◽  
Chad S. Dodson
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deah S. Quinlivan ◽  
Gary L. Wells ◽  
Jeffrey S. Neuschatz ◽  
Joy McClung ◽  
Molly Peterson ◽  
...  

Memory ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Shari R. Berkowitz ◽  
Brandon L. Garrett ◽  
Kimberly M. Fenn ◽  
Elizabeth F. Loftus

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 898-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curt A. Carlson ◽  
David F. Young ◽  
Dawn R. Weatherford ◽  
Maria A. Carlson ◽  
Jane E. Bednarz ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Rebecca Spearing ◽  
Kimberley A. Wade

A growing body of research suggests that confidence judgements can provide a useful indicator of memory accuracy under some conditions. One factor known to affect eyewitness accuracy, yet rarely examined in the confidence-accuracy literature, is retention interval. Using calibration analyses, we investigated how retention interval affects the confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness recall. In total, 611 adults watched a mock crime video and completed a cued-recall test either immediately, after 1 week, or after 1 month. Long (1 month) delays led to lower memory accuracy, lower confidence judgements, and impaired the confidence-accuracy relationship compared to shorter (immediate and 1 week) delays. Long-delay participants who reported very high levels of confidence tended to be over-confident in the accuracy of their memories compared to other participants. Self-rated memory ability, however, did not predict eyewitness confidence or the confidence-accuracy relationship. We discuss the findings in relation to cue-utilization theory and a retrieval-fluency account.


2017 ◽  
pp. 281-303
Author(s):  
Allwoo Carl Martin

Author(s):  
Joanna Pozzulo

This chapter discusses system variables that are under the control of the criminal justice system and can be manipulated after the crime has occurred, such as the type of lineup procedure shown to the eyewitness. The chapter first discusses recall memory and the different interviewing protocols and how these may interact with familiarity to influence an eyewitness’ memory of the perpetrator as well as the environment and event. Next, the chapter focuses on recognition memory, specifically lineup identification. The different lineup procedures used to collect eyewitness evidence are discussed, in addition to how each procedure may promote higher rates of accuracy and eyewitness confidence when a familiar-stranger is the perpetrator. Last, the chapter discusses unconscious transference and the commitment effect.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document