scholarly journals Pollination effectiveness of specialist and opportunistic nectar feeders influenced by invasive alien ants in the Seychelles

2020 ◽  
Vol 107 (7) ◽  
pp. 957-969
Author(s):  
Francisco Fuster ◽  
Christopher N. Kaiser‐Bunbury ◽  
Anna Traveset

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.L. Page ◽  
C.C. Nicholson ◽  
R.M. Brennan ◽  
A.T. Britzman ◽  
J. Greer ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-412
Author(s):  
Shoko Nakamura ◽  
Shunsuke Yamamoto ◽  
Nobuo Sawamura ◽  
Aoi Nikkeshi ◽  
Shigeki Kishi ◽  
...  

Abstract Most common cultivars of Oriental (or Japanese) persimmon, Diospyros kaki Thunb. (Ericales: Ebenaceae), set mostly female flowers and require pollen from male flowers of other cultivars for pollination. Growers often introduce the European honeybee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), into their orchards to promote pollination. Here, we investigated the pollination effectiveness of A. mellifera for D. kaki ‘Saijo,’ by monitoring flower visitors, analyzing pollen grains on bees’ body surfaces, and comparing the number of mature seeds in fruits among years with different pollinator availabilities. Apis mellifera and the bumblebee Bombus ardens ardens Smith (Hymenoptera: Apidae) were the major visitors for 3 years, although their dominance varied among years. The number of mature seeds was positively correlated with the number of B. ardens ​ardens visiting D. kaki flowers, but not with that of A. mellifera. Apis mellifera might be less efficient because visitors to female flowers carried significantly fewer pollen grains on their body surfaces than those of B. ardens ​ardens. Analysis of pollen loads of honeybees captured at their nest entrance suggested their preference for red clover, Trifolium pratense L. (Fabales: Fabaceae), and Toxicodendron spp. (Sapindales: Anacardiaceae), over D. kaki as a pollen source in our study site. The effectiveness of A. mellifera on D. kaki pollination should be carefully evaluated considering the effects of coexisting floral and pollinator species.



2020 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 171-179
Author(s):  
Mamehgol Yousefi ◽  
Azmin Shakrine Mohd Rafie ◽  
Samsuzana Abd Aziz ◽  
Syaril Azrad ◽  
Afifah binti ABD Razak


2007 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Fumero-Caban ◽  
E. J. Melendez-Ackerman


Oecologia ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaku Kudo ◽  
Hiroshi S. Ishii ◽  
Yuimi Hirabayashi ◽  
Takashi Y. Ida


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen L Page ◽  
Charlie C Nicholson ◽  
Ross Brennan ◽  
Anna Britzman ◽  
Jeremy Hemberger ◽  
...  

Many animals provide essential ecosystem services in the form of plant pollination. A rich literature documents considerable variation in the single visit pollination effectiveness of different plant visitors, but this literature has yet to be comprehensively synthesized. We conducted a hierarchical meta-analysis of 193 studies and extracted 1716 single visit effectiveness (SVE) comparisons for 252 plant species. We paired SVE data with visitation frequency data for 75 of these studies. Given the global dominance of honeybees in pollinator communities, we used these data to ask: 1) Do honeybees (Apis mellifera) and other floral visitors vary in their SVE?; 2) To what extent do plant and pollinator attributes predict the difference in SVE between honeybees and other visitors?; and 3) Is there a correlation between floral visitation frequency and SVE? We found that honeybees were significantly less effective than the most effective non-honeybee pollinator. Although not significantly different, honeybees also tended to be less effective than the mean community effectiveness. Honeybees were less effective as pollinators of crop plants and when compared to birds and other bees. Visitation frequency and pollination effectiveness were positively correlated, but this trend was largely driven by data from communities where honeybees were absent, suggesting that honeybees generally combine high visitation frequency and lower SVE. Our study demonstrates that non-honeybee floral visitors are highly effective pollinators of many crop and non-crop plants. While the high visitation frequency typically displayed by honeybees undoubtably makes them important pollinators, we show that honeybees are slightly less effective than the average pollinator and rarely the most effective pollinator of the plants they visit. As such, honeybees may be imperfect substitutes for the loss of wild pollinators and safeguarding global crop production will benefit from conservation of non-honeybee taxa.



2019 ◽  
Vol 223 (1) ◽  
pp. 354-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Valverde ◽  
Francisco Perfectti ◽  
José María Gómez


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document