effective pollinator
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

29
(FIVE YEARS 12)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen L Page ◽  
Charlie C Nicholson ◽  
Ross Brennan ◽  
Anna Britzman ◽  
Jeremy Hemberger ◽  
...  

Many animals provide essential ecosystem services in the form of plant pollination. A rich literature documents considerable variation in the single visit pollination effectiveness of different plant visitors, but this literature has yet to be comprehensively synthesized. We conducted a hierarchical meta-analysis of 193 studies and extracted 1716 single visit effectiveness (SVE) comparisons for 252 plant species. We paired SVE data with visitation frequency data for 75 of these studies. Given the global dominance of honeybees in pollinator communities, we used these data to ask: 1) Do honeybees (Apis mellifera) and other floral visitors vary in their SVE?; 2) To what extent do plant and pollinator attributes predict the difference in SVE between honeybees and other visitors?; and 3) Is there a correlation between floral visitation frequency and SVE? We found that honeybees were significantly less effective than the most effective non-honeybee pollinator. Although not significantly different, honeybees also tended to be less effective than the mean community effectiveness. Honeybees were less effective as pollinators of crop plants and when compared to birds and other bees. Visitation frequency and pollination effectiveness were positively correlated, but this trend was largely driven by data from communities where honeybees were absent, suggesting that honeybees generally combine high visitation frequency and lower SVE. Our study demonstrates that non-honeybee floral visitors are highly effective pollinators of many crop and non-crop plants. While the high visitation frequency typically displayed by honeybees undoubtably makes them important pollinators, we show that honeybees are slightly less effective than the average pollinator and rarely the most effective pollinator of the plants they visit. As such, honeybees may be imperfect substitutes for the loss of wild pollinators and safeguarding global crop production will benefit from conservation of non-honeybee taxa.


Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Eliana Aparecida Ferreira ◽  
Samuel Boff ◽  
Sandra S. Verza ◽  
Rosilda Mara Mussury

The flowers of plants of the genus Ludwigia are an important source of food for several species of bees. In the current study, we conducted an experiment with the aim to describe the reproductive biology and phenology of L. nervosa; to identify the species of visiting bees; analyze the foraging behavior of bees; and to investigate whether the reproductive success of the species is related to the foraging activity of bees. We found that the flowers received visits from several native bee species (n = 7), in addition of the exotic honey bees which came to be the dominant species. During visits the majority of the bees foraged in both resources, pollen and nectar. The significantly higher production of fruits in open pollinated pollination experiment compared to artificial cross pollination, suggests honey bees as effective pollinator of this plant species in the study site. Pollen deposition occurs efficiently, given the absence of pollen limitation. Despite massive visitation of honey bees, Ludwigianervosa is attractive to native bees, and therefore it may help to sustain population of both native and exotic pollinators in fragmented humid areas.


Insects ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Jordi Bosch ◽  
Sergio Osorio-Canadas ◽  
Fabio Sgolastra ◽  
Narcís Vicens

Osmia spp. are excellent orchard pollinators but evidence that their populations can be sustained in orchard environments and their use results in increased fruit production is scarce. We released an Osmia cornuta population in an almond orchard and measured its population dynamics, as well as visitation rates and fruit set at increasing distances from the nesting stations. Honeybees were 10 times more abundant than O. cornuta. However, the best models relating fruit set and bee visitation included only O. cornuta visitation, which explained 41% and 40% of the initial and final fruit set. Distance from the nesting stations explained 27.7% and 22.1% of the variability in initial and final fruit set. Of the 198 females released, 99 (54.4%) established and produced an average of 9.15 cells. Female population growth was 1.28. By comparing our results with those of previous O. cornuta studies we identify two important populational bottlenecks (female establishment and male-biased progeny sex ratios). Our study demonstrates that even a small population of a highly effective pollinator may have a significant impact on fruit set. Our results are encouraging for the use of Osmia managed populations and for the implementation of measures to promote wild pollinators in agricultural environments.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Demei Hu ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Mengda Xiang ◽  
Hanqing Tang ◽  
Xiaoxin Tang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Heterostylous plants are commonly associated with pollinators promoting disassortative pollination. How different morphs adapt to pollinators to ensure reproductive success and whether floral characters (such as pistil, stamen and nectar traits) are relevant to this process remain unclear. Results: Tirpitzia sinensis is distylous flowers. Its floral characters were measured. Field observation of effective pollinator and pollination efficiency to different morphs was conducted, and breeding systems were examined by hand pollination treatments. Our results showed that L-morph produced more but smaller pollen grains per anther than S-morph. T. sinensis secreted more nectar at night as a possible adaptation to hawkmoths (Macroglossum spp.) active at dusk. L-morph produced much nectar due to its large secretion volume at night. The nectar was rich in sucrose. The sucrose/hexose ratio was higher in the nectar of S-morph than in that of L-morph. S-morph had higher visit rate but lower pollination efficiency of hawkmoths compared with L-morph. T. sinensis was self-incompatible. Seed sets in nature did not differ between morphs. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that L-morph increases its pollination efficiency through outstanding stigma, many pollen grains per anther, and high amount of nectar. S-morph attracts many hawkmoths to pollinate due to its high sucrose/hexose ratio in its nectar.


Plant Biology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 924-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pauw ◽  
A. A. Cocucci ◽  
A. N. Sérsic
Keyword(s):  

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e8836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Luisa Barbosa Leal ◽  
Marina Muniz Moreira ◽  
Alessandra Ribeiro Pinto ◽  
Júlia de Oliveira Ferreira ◽  
Miguel Rodriguez-Girones ◽  
...  

A generalist pollination system may be characterized through the interaction of a plant species with two or more functional groups of pollinators. The spatiotemporal variation of the most effective pollinator is the factor most frequently advocated to explain the emergence and maintenance of generalist pollination systems. There are few studies merging variation in floral visitor assemblages and the efficacy of pollination by different functional groups. Thus, there are gaps in our knowledge about the variation in time of pollinator efficacy and frequency of generalist species. In this study, we evaluated the pollination efficacy of the floral visitors of Edmundoa lindenii (Bromeliaceae) and their frequency of visits across four reproductive events. We analyzed the frequency of the three groups of floral visitors (large bees, small bees, and hummingbirds) through focal observations in the reproductive events of 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018. We evaluated the pollination efficacy (fecundity after one visit) through selective exposure treatments and the breeding system by manual pollinations. We tested if the reproductive success after natural pollination varied between the reproductive events and also calculated the pollen limitation index. E. lindenii is a self-incompatible and parthenocarpic species, requiring the action of pollinators for sexual reproduction. Hummingbirds had higher efficacy than large bees and small bees acted only as pollen larcenists. The relative frequency of the groups of floral visitors varied between the reproductive events. Pollen limitation has occurred only in the reproductive event of 2017, when visits by hummingbirds were scarce and reproductive success after natural pollination was the lowest. We conclude that hummingbirds and large bees were the main and the secondary pollinators of E. lindenii, respectively, and that temporal variations in the pollinator assemblages had effects on its reproductive success. Despite their lower pollination efficacy, large bees ensured seed set when hummingbirds failed. Thus, we provide evidence that variable pollination environments may favor generalization, even under differential effectiveness of pollinator groups if secondary pollinators provide reproductive assurance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document