Transradial approach for carotid artery stenting: A feasibility study

2007 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 355-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Folmar ◽  
Ravish Sachar ◽  
Tift Mann
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Transradial Approach

Contralateral transradial approach for carotid artery stenting: A feasibility study

2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tejas Patel ◽  
Sanjay Shah ◽  
Alok Ranjan ◽  
Hemant Malhotra ◽  
Samir Pancholy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Feasibility Study ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Transradial Approach

P5.19 TRANSRADIAL APPROACH FOR CAROTID ARTERY STENTING: SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (C) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Damian Maciejewski* ◽  
Lukasz Tekieli ◽  
Anna Kablak-Ziembicka ◽  
Piotr Paluszek ◽  
Mariusz Trystula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Transradial Approach ◽  
Single Center Experience

scholarly journals TCT-199 The Transradial Approach is Safe and Effective for Carotid Artery Stenting

2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (17) ◽  
pp. B58
Author(s):  
Sasko Kedev ◽  
Slobodan Antov ◽  
Danica Petkoska ◽  
Tift Mann
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Transradial Approach

Safety of Slender 5Fr Transradial Approach for Carotid Artery Stenting With a Novel Nitinol Double-Layer Micromesh Stent

2015 ◽  
Vol 116 (6) ◽  
pp. 977-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasko Kedev ◽  
Danica Petkoska ◽  
Biljana Zafirovska ◽  
Ivan Vasilev ◽  
Olivier F. Bertrand
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Double Layer ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Transradial Approach ◽  
Micromesh Stent

scholarly journals A transradial approach for carotid artery stenting

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi HARAGUCHI ◽  
Kentarou TOYAMA ◽  
Mariko NAGAI ◽  
Nobuki MATSUURA ◽  
Takeo ITOU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Transradial Approach

The concept of an anatomy related individual arterial access: lowering technical and clinical complications with transradial access in bovine- and type-III aortic arch carotid artery stenting

VASA ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 468-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dahm ◽  
van Buuren ◽  
Hansen ◽  
Becker ◽  
Wolpers
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Carotid Artery Stenting ◽  
Access Site ◽  
Transradial Approach ◽  
Arterial Access ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Procedural Success ◽  
The Right ◽  
Diagnostic Catheter

Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) from the femoral approach can be anatomically very difficult and the incidence of complications is higher in patients with anatomical variations of the aortic arch, difficulties related to peripheral vascular disease and/or with access site complications. Because the typical morphology in patients with a bovine- or type-III aortic arch applies for an arterial access from the right upper extremity (e.g. radial, brachial) we evaluated success rates and safety of the right transradial access in a prospective study. Patients and methods: Between June 2009 and October 2010, seventeen patients (mean age 74,4 ± 9 years, 10 male) with a bovine- (n = 4) or type-III aortic arch (n = 12) underwent CAS with a planned transradial- (n = 3) or after problematic transfemoral access (n = 14). In patients with a type-III aortic arch (n = 13), the right target common carotid artery (CCA) was cannulated from the right radial artery with a 5F IMA diagnostic catheter-, in patients with a bovine aortic arch (n = 4), the left CCA was accessed from the right radial artery with a 5F Amplatz- or Judkins left catheter. In all patients a 6F- (n = 14) or 5F- (n = 3) shuttle sheath was inserted via the diagnostic catheter and a 0.035” extra-stiff guidewire. All interventions were carried out with the use of a peripheral embolization protection device (EPD). Primary study endpoints were procedural success and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), secondary endpoints were access site complications and the mean intervention time. Results: Procedural success could be achieved in all patients (100 %), MACCE and access site complications did not occur in any patient. Mean interventional time was 48 ± 18 min. Conclusions: CAS using the right transradial approach for left CAS in bovine-type aortic arch or the right transradial approach in type-III aortic arch for right CAS appears to be safe and technically feasible.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document