The hidden observer: final thoughts but not the last word

10.1002/ch.3 ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph P. Green ◽  
Roger A. Page ◽  
George W. Handley ◽  
Rouhangiz Rasekhy
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
pp. 154-169
Author(s):  
O.B. Zaslavskii ◽  
Keyword(s):  

It is shown that the same scene or situation passes through Pushkin’s works in which an observer watching for two or more objects is present. If an object of dangerous observation is a woman, the scene, as a rule, ends up with her faint or death. The presence of such an observer can be considered as uncontrolled intrusion of fate into human’s life. Uncovering the scheme under consideration is especially important since poetics of Pushkin is extremely laconic, so even in a finished text one is led to reconstruct some implicit details. Then, a given invariant (related just to the property of reticence) can serve as a tool for independent check. In particular, its application agrees with interpretation of the final scene in “The Stone Guest” that was suggested by us earlier from completely different rationale.


1994 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas P. Spanos ◽  
Ewy Bures

Hypnotic, task-motivated and simulating subjects were administered a suggestion for a false memory (hearing noises) while “reliving” the events of an earlier night. Simulators reported the suggested noises more frequently than hypnotic subjects, and subjects in the three conditions failed to differ in endorsing the noises as real after termination of the “reliving” procedure. Subjects in the three conditions were also equally likely to reverse their pseudomemory reports following hidden observer instructions. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that pseudomemory responding in this paradigm reflects reporting bias rather than memory distortion.


1988 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Nadon ◽  
Joyce D'eon ◽  
Kevin M. McConkey ◽  
Jean-Roch Laurence ◽  
Campbell Perry

1985 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 611-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas P. Spanos ◽  
Hans P. de Groot ◽  
Dale K. Tiller ◽  
John R. Weekes ◽  
Lorne D. Bertrand

1997 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-80
Author(s):  
Gary T. Rosenthal ◽  
Barlow Soper ◽  
Rebecca S. Tabony ◽  
Abe Rosenthal

A study was conducted to evaluate persons' purported ability to detect hidden observers. Anecdotally, most people (87%) report that covert observation can be detected. A total of 140 college students individually sat in a room with a two-way mirror and video-monitor camera. They were told that they might be observed for any or all of the subsequent 5 min. Participants noted whether they felt a hidden observer watched them during each minute of the 5-min. session. After the session, students reported if a possible hidden observer watched via a two-way mirror or video camera or if they were not watched. Students were unable to detect observation beyond chance. Possible reasons for the persistence of the belief in detection of covert observation are posited as impetus for further research.


1983 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Roch Laurence ◽  
Campbell Perry ◽  
John F. Kihlstrom
Keyword(s):  

1981 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 334-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Roch Laurence ◽  
Campbell Perry
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Jay Lynn ◽  
Cornelia Maré ◽  
Steven Kvaal ◽  
David Segal ◽  
Harry Sivec

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document