scholarly journals Mapping adolescent reward anticipation, receipt, and prediction error during the monetary incentive delay task

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 262-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhipeng Cao ◽  
Marc Bennett ◽  
Catherine Orr ◽  
Ilknur Icke ◽  
Tobias Banaschewski ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 496-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Paul Wilson ◽  
◽  
Marco Colizzi ◽  
Matthijs Geert Bossong ◽  
Paul Allen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 969-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Will Lawn ◽  
James Hill ◽  
Chandni Hindocha ◽  
Jocelyn Yim ◽  
Yumeya Yamamori ◽  
...  

Background: Cannabidiol has potential therapeutic benefits for people with psychiatric disorders characterised by reward function impairment. There is existing evidence that cannabidiol may influence some aspects of reward processing. However, it is unknown whether cannabidiol acutely affects brain function underpinning reward anticipation and feedback. Hypotheses: We predicted that cannabidiol would augment brain activity associated with reward anticipation and feedback. Methods: We administered a single 600 mg oral dose of cannabidiol and matched placebo to 23 healthy participants in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures design. We employed the monetary incentive delay task during functional magnetic resonance imaging to assay the neural correlates of reward anticipation and feedback. We conducted whole brain analyses and region-of-interest analyses in pre-specified reward-related brain regions. Results: The monetary incentive delay task elicited expected brain activity during reward anticipation and feedback, including in the insula, caudate, nucleus accumbens, anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex. However, across the whole brain, we did not find any evidence that cannabidiol altered reward-related brain activity. Moreover, our Bayesian analyses showed that activity in our regions-of-interest was similar following cannabidiol and placebo. Additionally, our behavioural measures of motivation for reward did not show a significant difference between cannabidiol and placebo. Discussion: Cannabidiol did not acutely affect the neural correlates of reward anticipation and feedback in healthy participants. Future research should explore the effects of cannabidiol on different components of reward processing, employ different doses and administration regimens, and test its reward-related effects in people with psychiatric disorders.


2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (9) ◽  
pp. S303-S304
Author(s):  
Jack Kaufman ◽  
Joseph Kim ◽  
Anna Bradford ◽  
Jacob Germain ◽  
Victor Patron ◽  
...  

NeuroImage ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 207 ◽  
pp. 116368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isha Dhingra ◽  
Sheng Zhang ◽  
Simon Zhornitsky ◽  
Thang M. Le ◽  
Wuyi Wang ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 146 ◽  
pp. e151
Author(s):  
Jane Joseph ◽  
X. Zhu ◽  
C. Benca ◽  
G. Baik ◽  
F. Davies ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1576-1589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liam J Nestor ◽  
Anna Murphy ◽  
John McGonigle ◽  
Csaba Orban ◽  
Laurence Reed ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 529-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna T. Patel ◽  
Michael C. Stevens ◽  
Shashwath A. Meda ◽  
Christine Muska ◽  
Andre D. Thomas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document