scholarly journals The acute effects of cannabidiol on the neural correlates of reward anticipation and feedback in healthy volunteers

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 969-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Will Lawn ◽  
James Hill ◽  
Chandni Hindocha ◽  
Jocelyn Yim ◽  
Yumeya Yamamori ◽  
...  

Background: Cannabidiol has potential therapeutic benefits for people with psychiatric disorders characterised by reward function impairment. There is existing evidence that cannabidiol may influence some aspects of reward processing. However, it is unknown whether cannabidiol acutely affects brain function underpinning reward anticipation and feedback. Hypotheses: We predicted that cannabidiol would augment brain activity associated with reward anticipation and feedback. Methods: We administered a single 600 mg oral dose of cannabidiol and matched placebo to 23 healthy participants in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures design. We employed the monetary incentive delay task during functional magnetic resonance imaging to assay the neural correlates of reward anticipation and feedback. We conducted whole brain analyses and region-of-interest analyses in pre-specified reward-related brain regions. Results: The monetary incentive delay task elicited expected brain activity during reward anticipation and feedback, including in the insula, caudate, nucleus accumbens, anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex. However, across the whole brain, we did not find any evidence that cannabidiol altered reward-related brain activity. Moreover, our Bayesian analyses showed that activity in our regions-of-interest was similar following cannabidiol and placebo. Additionally, our behavioural measures of motivation for reward did not show a significant difference between cannabidiol and placebo. Discussion: Cannabidiol did not acutely affect the neural correlates of reward anticipation and feedback in healthy participants. Future research should explore the effects of cannabidiol on different components of reward processing, employ different doses and administration regimens, and test its reward-related effects in people with psychiatric disorders.

2021 ◽  
Vol 89 (9) ◽  
pp. S303-S304
Author(s):  
Jack Kaufman ◽  
Joseph Kim ◽  
Anna Bradford ◽  
Jacob Germain ◽  
Victor Patron ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 496-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Paul Wilson ◽  
◽  
Marco Colizzi ◽  
Matthijs Geert Bossong ◽  
Paul Allen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 262-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhipeng Cao ◽  
Marc Bennett ◽  
Catherine Orr ◽  
Ilknur Icke ◽  
Tobias Banaschewski ◽  
...  

NeuroImage ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Knutson ◽  
Andrew Westdorp ◽  
Erica Kaiser ◽  
Daniel Hommer

2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (9) ◽  
pp. S271-S272
Author(s):  
Kiana Khosravian ◽  
Hanna Keren ◽  
Liana Meffert ◽  
Daniel S. Pine ◽  
Argyris Stringaris

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. P. Bennett ◽  
H. Kiiski ◽  
Z. Cao ◽  
F. R. Farina ◽  
R. Knight ◽  
...  

AbstractHyperactivity/impulsivity and inattention are core symptoms dimensions in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Some approaches suggest that these symptoms arise from deficits in the ability to anticipate and process rewards. However, evidence is equivocal with regard to ADHD-related differences in brain activity during reward processing. The aim of this study was to investigate when, and how, reward-related ERP activity was associated with hyperactive/impulsive symptoms and inattention symptoms. Adults with ADHD (n=34) and matched comparison participants (n=36) completed an electrophysiological version of the Monetary Incentive Delay task. This task separates reward processing into two stages-namely, an anticipation stage and a delivery stage. During the anticipation stage, visual cues signalled a possible monetary incentive (i.e. a reward or loss). After a brief delay, the delivery stage began, and incentives were delivered contingent on a speeded button-press. Electroencephalogram activity was simultaneously sampled and incentive-related event relate potentials (ERPs) calculated. These data were then analysed by calculating multiple regression models, at each sample point, wherein the correlation between incentive-related ERPs and ADHD symptoms was estimated. Linear and curvilinear associations between ERP activity and ADHD symptoms were tested in each regression mode. Findings suggest that ADHD symptoms were associated ERP activity at different reward processing stages. Hyperactive/impulsive symptoms were associated with reduced ERP activity during the initial anticipation of rewards from 224-329 ms post-reward cue. Inattention symptoms were associated with reduced ERP activity during the initial delivery of rewards from 251-280 ms post-reward onset. Finally, extreme ends of hyperactive/impulsive and inattention symptoms were associated with reduced ERP activity towards the end of the anticipation stage from 500 ms post-reward cue onwards. These results support the idea that reward processing is disrupted in ADHD while also shedding new light on the dynamic relationship between ADHD symptom dimensions and the neurological mechanisms of reward processing.


NeuroImage ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 207 ◽  
pp. 116368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isha Dhingra ◽  
Sheng Zhang ◽  
Simon Zhornitsky ◽  
Thang M. Le ◽  
Wuyi Wang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document