Global Public Goods for Health. Health Economic and Public Health Perspectives, Edited by Richard Smith, Robert Beaglehole, David Woodward and Nick Drager. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003. No. of pages: 287. ISBN 0-19-852798-5

2004 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 501-501
Author(s):  
Bruce Hollingsworth
2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-156
Author(s):  
Kerry Whiteside

Public goods, as economists use the term, are “nonrival” (one person's consumption does not make it unavailable for others) and, typically, “nonexcludable” (if the good is provided to one person, others cannot be prevented from enjoying it as well). The classic example is the lighthouse, whose warning light goes out to and benefits all ships. Economists devote special attention to public goods because markets do not deliver them efficiently. Rational, self-interested actors realize that if anyone else provides this good, they can have it without paying for it. The incentives favor “free riding.” Others, however, see the same opportunity and so public goods go underprovided. There is thus a strong case for collective action to furnish public goods. Where collective benefits outweigh the costs of provision, government action can make society as a whole better-off.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S64-S76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon Brown ◽  
Daniel Susskind

Abstract This paper explores the concept of ‘global public goods’ (GPGs) in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. It argues that many of the tasks involved in public health, and in particular those involved in the control of an infectious disease like COVID-19, ought to be treated as GPGs that can only be effectively delivered through international cooperation. It sets out what a cooperative response to the COVID-19 pandemic should look like and introduces ideas for further discussion about how it might be financed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document