Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: a meta-analytic review

2003 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Parker ◽  
Boris B. Baltes ◽  
Scott A. Young ◽  
Joseph W. Huff ◽  
Robert A. Altmann ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Dorota Weziak-Bialowolska ◽  
Piotr Bialowolski ◽  
Carlued Leon ◽  
Tamar Koosed ◽  
Eileen McNeely

The current literature’s focus on unidirectional effects of psychological and organizational climates at work on work outcomes fails to capture the full relationship between these factors. This article examines whether a psychological climate for caring contributes to specific work outcomes and investigates whether work outcomes support the climate for caring, creating a feedback loop. Results confirm a bi-directional, temporal association between perceived climate for caring and two of the four explored work outcomes: self-reported productivity and self-reported work quality. The effect of a perceived caring climate on these work outcomes was stronger than the effect in the opposite direction. The perception that the work climate was caring was also found to affect work engagement, but the reverse relationship was not identified. We did not find any evidence for a link between job satisfaction and a climate for caring at work in either direction.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mindy E. Bergman ◽  
Patrick A. Palmieri ◽  
Fritz Drasgow ◽  
Alayne J. Ormerod

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyanka Aggarwal ◽  
Reetesh K. Singh

Purpose This paper aims to examine whether and how internal and external typologies of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and employees’ CSR participation (CSRP) differentially impact organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and turnover intentions (TI), mediated by meaningful work (MW) and affective commitment (AC) and moderated by CSR motive attributions. Design/methodology/approach Bootstrapped structural equation modeling using AMOS and mediation and moderation analysis using Hayes’ Process macro in SPSS are performed on a sample of 193 employees from diverse industries in India. Findings The CSR-work outcomes relationship is rather multifaceted. Internal CSR (ICSR) and CSRP directly promote the meaningfulness of work and AC. Further, all three kinds of CSR (ICSR, external CSR (ECSR) and CSRP) influence work behaviors (OCB and TI) sequentially via MW and AC. Intrinsic (extrinsic) CSR attributions strengthen (weaken) the positive effect of ECSR on MW. Nevertheless, the conditional indirect effects could not be established, warranting further investigation. Practical implications The management must elevate employees’ CSR awareness allowing them to partake in the planning and execution of CSR programs that are authentic, righteous and seamlessly unified with core business activities to nurture work meaningfulness and positive employee attitudes and behaviors. Originality/value This is the foremost study that involves a bibliometric analysis of employee-based CSR research and a systematic meta-analytic review of the relationship between CSR and meaningfulness from employees’ perspectives. The present study is novel as it divulges an integrative framework about how employees’ CSR perceptions, participation/volunteering and attributions collectively influence the work outcomes at three levels (namely, cognitive, attitudinal and behavioral), drawing on sensemaking, needs and justice-based views, social identity, social exchange and attribution theories. Thus, new nuances are added to extant micro-CSR literature.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 491-518
Author(s):  
HoKwan Cheung ◽  
Caren B. Goldberg ◽  
Alison M. Konrad ◽  
Alex Lindsey ◽  
Vias Nicolaides ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1189-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Kiewitz ◽  
Wayne A. Hochwarter ◽  
Gerald R. Ferris ◽  
Stephanie L. Castro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document