The Role of Psychological Climate in Neutralizing the Effects of Organizational Politics on Work Outcomes

2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1189-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Kiewitz ◽  
Wayne A. Hochwarter ◽  
Gerald R. Ferris ◽  
Stephanie L. Castro
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 16529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marla Baskerville Watkins ◽  
Alexis Nicole Smith ◽  
Erin D. Cooke ◽  
Michael S Christian

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upasna A. Agarwal

Purpose This paper aims to test the effects of perception of organizational politics (POPS) on work outcomes–work engagement, innovative work behaviour and turnover intention. Mediating role of work engagement and the moderating role of locus of control (LOC) on perceived organizational politics–outcome (innovative work behaviour and turnover intention) relationship was investigated. Design/methodology/approach Data were gathered from a sample of 302 full-time managerial employees in India. Results suggest that perceived organizational politics is significantly related to intention to quit and innovative work behaviour, and this relationship is partially mediated by work engagement. LOC moderates the organizational politics–work outcomes (work engagement and innovative work behaviour) relationship. Findings The current research demonstrates that availability of a work environment, where there are unfair decisions, nepotism and favoritism, is an impediment to engagement, innovative work behaviour and retention of managers. It behooves of top management therefore focusing on reducing POPS and subsequent deficits in motivation by providing clear feedback regarding which behaviours their organization desires. Research limitations/implications The study focused on POPS as reported by the employees and not on actual political behaviours. As the study did not cover all sectors, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution. Originality/value The study extended the current research stream of perceived organizational politics research to one of the underrepresented developing Asian countries, India. The study also contributes in terms of its sample characteristics. Managerial employees working across different sectors, served as the setting of our empirical study.


2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carra S. Sims ◽  
Fritz Drasgow ◽  
Louise F. Fitzgerald ◽  
Reeshad S. Dalal

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 417-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Pachler ◽  
Angela Kuonath ◽  
Julia Specht ◽  
Silja Kennecke ◽  
Maria Agthe ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Chen ◽  
Zhe Zhang ◽  
Ming Jia

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the effect of stretch goals on unethical behavior and explore the mediating role of ambivalent identification and moderating role of competitive psychological climate.Design/methodology/approachA total of 350 MBA students from Northwestern China completed the two-phase survey. The bootstrapping analysis outlined by Hayes was used to assess a moderated mediation model.FindingsThis study found that stretch goals could trigger employees' unethical behavior via ambivalent identification. Competitive psychological climate intensified the relationship between stretch goals and ambivalent identification. Moreover, such a climate aggravated the indirect effect of stretch goals on unethical behavior via ambivalent identification.Practical implicationsOrganizations and managers should use stretch goals prudently and implement measures to reduce the ethical cost.Originality/valueThis study provides unique contributions by identifying ambivalent identification as an important mediator and competitive psychological climate as a boundary condition of stretch goals' disruptive effect on unethical behavior.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document