The radial forearm snake flap: A novel approach to oral cavity and oropharyngeal reconstruction that reduces forearm donor site morbidity

Microsurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi K. Garg ◽  
Aaron M. Wieland ◽  
Samuel O. Poore ◽  
Ruston Sanchez ◽  
Gregory K. Hartig
1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P131-P131
Author(s):  
Andreas Werle ◽  
Edward Bruce Toby ◽  
Terance T Tsue ◽  
Douglas A Girod

Author(s):  
John W. Canady ◽  
Sue Ann Thompson ◽  
Jerald B. Moon ◽  
Richard L. Glowacki

Patients with mild velopharyngeal incompetence (VPI) may have speech disorders, which are not sufficiently severe to warrant extensive surgical intervention, yet may not be amenable to correction by speech therapy alone. Augmentation of the posterior pharyngeal wall to aid in closure of the velopharyngeal sphincter may be beneficial in establishing better speech patterns, especially when combined with speech therapy. A variety of materials and techniques have been used in the past for this purpose. In this setting, autogenous fat may be transplanted without the risks incurred by augmentation with synthetic materials and involves very little donor site morbidity. The literature is somewhat contradictory, however, regarding the stability of the augmentation achieved using autogenous fat and there are no histologic studies describing the fate of fat injected into tissues of the oral cavity. Prior to introduction of this technique into clinical practice, this study was designed to investigate the fate of autogenous fat injected submucosally in the oropharyngeal region. Autogenous fat was injected into the anterior soft palate using the rabbit as a model. Histologic and gross inspections were performed at 2 days, 1, 2, and 4 weeks after injections. At the end of 4 weeks, at least 50% of the injection sites had visible evidence of augmentation, and 90% had histologic evidence of submucosal fat. In some instances most of the fat was resorbed; however, there were no instances of clinical infection or necrosis of the injection site. We conclude that submucosal injection of autogenous fat is a feasible alternative to using synthetic or other biologic materials for augmentation in the oral cavity.


Microsurgery ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 583-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas I. Gravvanis ◽  
Dimosthenis A. Tsoutsos ◽  
Thomais Iconomou ◽  
George Gremoutis

2006 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 1171-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennaro Selvaggi ◽  
Stan Monstrey ◽  
Piet Hoebeke ◽  
Peter Ceulemans ◽  
Koen Van Landuyt ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 370-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. V. Nehrer-Tairych ◽  
T. Rath ◽  
O. Schuhfried ◽  
W Millesi ◽  
M. Frey

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 109-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Thiele ◽  
C. Wulke ◽  
E. Roepke ◽  
S. Knipping

Folia Medica ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitar D. Pazardzhikliev ◽  
Christo D. Shipkov ◽  
Ilya P. Yovchev ◽  
Regina H. Khater ◽  
Ivailo S. Kamishev

ABSTRACT Adequate reconstruction of defects that are consequences of glossectomy is of primary importance for achieving satisfactory functional results and improving the quality of life. AIM: The aim of this study was to report a case of free flap reconstruction of a subtotal glossectomy defect and discuss it in relation to other available methods. CASE REPORT: A 48- year-old woman was operated on for a T4N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. A subtotal glossectomy via mandibular swing procedure with bilateral supraomohyoid neck dissection and reconstruction with a radial forearm free flap (RFFF) was performed. Surgery was followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. RESULTS: The post-operative period was uneventful. The patient resumed intelligible speech evaluated as “excellent” and oral feeding. The donor site morbidity was acceptable. Present reconstructive options of the tongue include two categories: to maintain mobility or to provide bulk. In glossectomy with 30 to 50 percent preservation of the original musculature, maintaining the mobility of the remaining tongue by a thin, pliable flap is preferred. This can be achieved by infrahyoid myofascial, medial sural artery perforator flap, RFFF, anterolateral thigh and ulnar forearm flap. When the post-resectional volume is less than 30 percent of the original tongue, the reconstruction shifts to restoration of bulk to facilitate swallowing by providing contact of the neotongue with the palate. Flaps providing bulk include the free TRAM flap, latissimus dorsi myocutaneous free flap, pectoralis major musculocutaneous flap and trapezius island flap. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of advanced tongue cancer requires adequate reconstruction with restoration of speech, swallowing and oral feeding. Free tissue transfer seems to achieve superior functional results with acceptable donor site morbidity when indicated.


2007 ◽  
Vol 137 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P151-P152
Author(s):  
Maya Sardesai ◽  
John H-J Yoo ◽  
Jason H Franklin ◽  
Connie Wyllie Naftel ◽  
Linda Denning ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document