perforator flap
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1929
(FIVE YEARS 516)

H-INDEX

52
(FIVE YEARS 6)

Microsurgery ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Daar ◽  
Lavinia M. Anzai ◽  
Neil M. Vranis ◽  
Michael L. Schulster ◽  
Jordan D. Frey ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e4014
Author(s):  
Qingfeng Yang ◽  
Zankai Wu ◽  
Xue Zhang ◽  
Juan Feng ◽  
Hengqiang Zhao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 74-81
Author(s):  
A. A. Trefilov ◽  
E. V. Kryukov ◽  
V. N. Troyan ◽  
S. V. Tereshchuk ◽  
V. A. Suharev ◽  
...  

The study describes a clinical case of preoperative planning of an anterolateral femur perforator flap and a peroneal autograft to eliminate a maxillofacial defect. During preparation for the surgery, an anatomical feature of the structure of both extremities circulatory system was found, which did not allow full use of the donor area tissues for subsequent surgical intervention. This feature was identified by Doppler ultrasound, but the final picture became clear only due to the study by computed tomography angiography.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 341-344
Author(s):  
Jong Yun Choi ◽  
Jeong Hwa Seo ◽  
Won Jin Cha ◽  
Bommie Florence Seo ◽  
Sung-No Jung

Reconstruction of submental defects is a challenge that needs to be approached carefully, since many important anatomical structures are located in this small space. Both aesthetic and functional outcomes should be considered during reconstruction. In this report, we describe a case where a superficial branch of the transverse cervical artery (STCA) perforator propeller flap was applied for coverage of the submental area. An 85-year-old woman presented with a 3-cm ovoid mass on her submental area. We covered the large submental defect with a STCA rotational flap in a 180° propeller pattern. The flap survived well without any complications at 1 year of follow-up. A STCA propeller flap is a useful surgical option in reconstruction for defect coverage of the submental area.


Author(s):  
Akitatsu Hayashi ◽  
Giuseppe Visconti ◽  
Guido Giacalone ◽  
Nobuko Hayashi ◽  
Hidehiko Yoshimatsu

Abstract Background Currently, microsurgeons are in the era of supermicrosurgery and perforator flap reconstruction. As these reconstructions frequently utilize vessels that are smaller than a single millimeter, understanding of location of lymphatic vessels and perforator anatomy preoperatively is essential. To change with the times, the role of ultrasound has changed from just an adjunct to primary imaging of the choice in reconstructive supermicrosurgery. Recently, a novel ultrasonographic technique involving the use of ultra-high frequency ultrasound (UHFUS) frequencies has entered the scene, and appears a promising tool in surgical planning. Methods The literatures on the applications of UHFUS in reconstructive supermicrosurgery were retrieved and reviewed from more than 60 literatures have been published on the surgical applications of UHFUS. Results Nine studies were retrieved from the literature on the applications of UHFUS in reconstructive supermicrosurgery. The articles report both application for lymphatic surgery and perforator flaps. Conclusions UHFUS application involves an increasing number of reconstructive supermicrosurgery field. UHFUS is a valuable and powerful tool for any reconstructive surgeons who are interested in performing supermicrosurgery.


Author(s):  
Giuseppe Visconti ◽  
Alessandro Bianchi ◽  
Akitatsu Hayashi ◽  
Marzia Salgarello

Abstract Background Preoperative knowledge of themicrovascular anatomy of a patientmay improve safetyand efficacy and reduce morbidity. Today, with the advancement in technology, ultrasound can provide minute details of the structures within the body, which makes this technology very helpful in preoperative evaluation of the traditional perforator flaps as well as thin, superthin, and pure skin perforator flaps. Methods In this article, we will describe the design of one of the most popular perforator flaps, the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap, using high-frequency and ultrahigh-frequency ultrasound technology. Results Ultrasound technology allows to study preoperatively the ALT donor-site and its microvascular anatomy by using different US modalities in order to provide a virtual surgical plan to the operating surgeon. Conclusion Ultrasound technology allow to expand preoperative knowledge of flap microvascular anatomy and its course within the subcutaneous tissue up to and within the dermis, allowing to select the best perforator for the given reconstruction and the plane of elevation for thin, superthin and pure skin perforator flap.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (24) ◽  
pp. 5875
Author(s):  
Sebastian Fischer ◽  
Yannick F. Diehm ◽  
Dimitra Kotsougiani-Fischer ◽  
Emre Gazyakan ◽  
Christian A. Radu ◽  
...  

Microsurgical breast reconstruction demands the highest level of expertise in both reconstructive and aesthetic plastic surgery. Implementation of such a complex surgical procedure is generally associated with a learning curve defined by higher complication rates at the beginning. The aim of this study was to present an approach for teaching deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) and transverse upper gracilis (TUG) flap breast reconstruction, which can diminish complications and provide satisfying outcomes from the beginning. DIEP and TUG flap procedures for breast reconstruction were either performed by a senior surgeon (>200 DIEP/TUG, ”no-training group”), or taught to one of five trainees (>80 breast surgeries; >50 free flaps) in a step-wise approach. The latter were either performed by the senior surgeon, and a trainee was assisting the surgery (“passive training”); by the trainee, and a senior surgeon was supervising (“active training”); or by the trainee without a senior surgeon (“after training”). Surgeries of each group were analyzed regarding OR-time, complications, and refinement procedures. A total of 95 DIEP and 93 TUG flaps were included into this study. Before the first DIEP/TUG flap without supervision, each trainee underwent a mean of 6.8 DIEP and 7.3 TUG training surgeries (p > 0.05). Outcome measures did not reveal any statistically significant differences (passive training/active training/after training/no-training: OR-time (min): DIEP: 331/351/338/304 (p > 0.05); TUG: 229/214/239/217 (p > 0.05); complications (n): DIEP: 6/13/16/11 (p > 0.05); TUG: 6/19/23/11 (p > 0.05); refinement procedures (n): DIEP:71/63/49/44 (p > 0.05); TUG: 65/41/36/56 (p > 0.05)), indicating safe and secure implementation of this step-wise training approach for microsurgical breast reconstruction in both aesthetic and reconstructive measures. Of note, despite being a perforator flap, DIEP flap required no more training than TUG flap, highlighting the importance of flap inset at the recipient site.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document