Conditional validation sampling for consistent risk estimation with binary outcome data subject to misclassification

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-233
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Gravel ◽  
Patrick J. Farrell ◽  
Daniel Krewski

Biometrics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard Rosner ◽  
Roy C. Milton


Biometrics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 287-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Lyles ◽  
John M. Williamson ◽  
Hung-Mo Lin ◽  
Charles M. Heilig


2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. A361-A362
Author(s):  
L Nagy ◽  
G Kay ◽  
C Parker ◽  
A Padhiar ◽  
JM O'Rourke ◽  
...  


Addiction ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 105 (6) ◽  
pp. 1005-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Smolkowski ◽  
Brian G. Danaher ◽  
John R. Seeley ◽  
Derek B. Kosty ◽  
Herbert H. Severson


Author(s):  
Krishna K. Saha ◽  
Daniel Miller ◽  
Suojin Wang

AbstractInterval estimation of the proportion parameter in the analysis of binary outcome data arising in cluster studies is often an important problem in many biomedical applications. In this paper, we propose two approaches based on the profile likelihood and Wilson score. We compare them with two existing methods recommended for complex survey data and some other methods that are simple extensions of well-known methods such as the likelihood, the generalized estimating equation of Zeger and Liang and the ratio estimator approach of Rao and Scott. An extensive simulation study is conducted for a variety of parameter combinations for the purposes of evaluating and comparing the performance of these methods in terms of coverage and expected lengths. Applications to biomedical data are used to illustrate the proposed methods.



Author(s):  
Mohamed M. Shoukri
Keyword(s):  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document