scholarly journals Effect of information and exercise programmes after lumbar disc surgery: A randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Saltskår Jentoft ◽  
Alice Kvåle ◽  
Jörg Assmus ◽  
Vegard Pihl Moen
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Disc Surgery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Disc Surgery ◽  
Exercise Programmes

scholarly journals Effectiveness of behavioral graded activity after first-time lumbar disc surgery: short term results of a randomized controlled trial

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 637-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. J. G. Ostelo ◽  
H. C. W. de Vet ◽  
M. W. Berfelo ◽  
M. R. Kerckhoffs ◽  
J. W. S. Vlaeyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Disc Surgery ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Disc Surgery ◽  
Graded Activity ◽  
First Time

scholarly journals Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Arts ◽  
Ronald Brand ◽  
Bas van der Kallen ◽  
Geert Lycklama à Nijeholt ◽  
Wilco Peul
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Muscle Injury ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Disc Surgery ◽  
Conventional Surgery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Disc Surgery

The effectiveness of exercise programmes after lumbar disc surgery: a randomized controlled study

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Filiz ◽  
Aysegul Cakmak ◽  
Emel Ozcan
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Lumbar Disc Surgery ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Disc Surgery ◽  
Exercise Programmes

scholarly journals Comparison of Open Discectomy with Microendoscopic Discectomy in Lumbar Disc Herniations: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0035-1554548-s-0035-1554548
Author(s):  
Asdrubal Falavigna ◽  
Orlando Righesso ◽  
Alisson Roberto Teles ◽  
Pedro Guarise da Silva ◽  
Fernanda Chalá
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Disc Herniations ◽  
Microendoscopic Discectomy

Return to work after surgery for lumbar disc herniation, secondary analyses from a randomized controlled trial comparing supervised rehabilitation versus home exercises

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rune Tendal Paulsen ◽  
Jesper Rasmussen ◽  
Leah Y. Carreon ◽  
Mikkel Østerheden Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Secondary Analyses

Home exercise programmes supported by video and automated reminders compared with standard paper-based home exercise programmes in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1068-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kellie B Emmerson ◽  
Katherine E Harding ◽  
Nicholas F Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Exercise Programme ◽  
Home Exercise ◽  
Smart Technology ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Home Exercise Programme ◽  
Standard Paper ◽  
Exercise Programmes

Objective: To determine whether patients with stroke receiving rehabilitation for upper limb deficits using smart technology (video and reminder functions) demonstrate greater adherence to prescribed home exercise programmes and better functional outcomes when compared with traditional paper-based exercise prescription. Design: Randomized controlled trial comparing upper limb home exercise programmes supported by video and automated reminders on smart technology, with standard paper-based home exercise programmes. Setting: A community rehabilitation programme within a large metropolitan health service. Subjects: Patients with stroke with upper limb deficits, referred for outpatient rehabilitation. Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to the control (paper-based home exercise programme) or intervention group (home exercise programme filmed on an electronic tablet, with an automated reminder). Both groups completed their prescribed home exercise programme for four weeks. Main measures: The primary outcome was adherence using a self-reported log book. Secondary outcomes were change in upper limb function and patient satisfaction. Results: A total of 62 participants were allocated to the intervention ( n = 30) and control groups ( n = 32). There were no differences between the groups for measures of adherence (mean difference 2%, 95% CI −12 to 17) or change in the Wolf Motor Function Test log transformed time (mean difference 0.02 seconds, 95% CI −0.1 to 0.1). There were no between-group differences in how participants found instructions ( p = 0.452), whether they remembered to do their exercises ( p = 0.485), or whether they enjoyed doing their exercises ( p = 0.864). Conclusions: The use of smart technology was not superior to standard paper-based home exercise programmes for patients recovering from stroke. This trial design was registered prospectively with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register, ID: ACTRN 12613000786796. http://www.anzctr.org.au/trialSearch.aspx

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document