scholarly journals Letter to the editor concerning “Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial” by Arts M, Brand R et al. (2011) Eur Spine J 20(1):51–57

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 898-898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reginald Q. Knight
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Muscle Injury ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Disc Surgery ◽  
Conventional Surgery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Letter To The Editor ◽  
Disc Surgery

scholarly journals Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Arts ◽  
Ronald Brand ◽  
Bas van der Kallen ◽  
Geert Lycklama à Nijeholt ◽  
Wilco Peul
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Muscle Injury ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Disc Surgery ◽  
Conventional Surgery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Disc Surgery

scholarly journals Effectiveness of behavioral graded activity after first-time lumbar disc surgery: short term results of a randomized controlled trial

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 637-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. J. G. Ostelo ◽  
H. C. W. de Vet ◽  
M. W. Berfelo ◽  
M. R. Kerckhoffs ◽  
J. W. S. Vlaeyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Disc Surgery ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Disc Surgery ◽  
Graded Activity ◽  
First Time

scholarly journals Effect of information and exercise programmes after lumbar disc surgery: A randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Saltskår Jentoft ◽  
Alice Kvåle ◽  
Jörg Assmus ◽  
Vegard Pihl Moen
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Lumbar Disc Surgery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Disc Surgery ◽  
Exercise Programmes

scholarly journals Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Sung Kim ◽  
Jun Ho Lee ◽  
Junseok Bae ◽  
Dong Chan Lee ◽  
Sang-Ha Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract BackgroundAdvances in minimally invasive surgery have expanded the indications for interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy. Although the clinical outcomes for this approach may be equivalent to those of conventional microscopic discectomy, the supporting evidence is based on small, single-center, prospective, and retrospective studies. Therefore, a multicenter, randomized controlled trial is warranted.MethodsThis will be a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy to those of conventional microscopic discectomy. The trial will enroll 100 participants with a lumbar disc herniation, 50 in each group. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 12 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes will be: back and leg pain (visual analog scale); the ODI; the EuroQol-5-Dimension score; patient satisfaction; and walking distance/time and time to return to daily activities post-surgery. Surgical outcomes will include postoperative drainage, operative time, duration of hospital stay, postoperative creatine kinase level as an indicator of muscle injury, and postoperative scarring. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and simple radiography will be performed to evaluate radiographic outcomes between the two surgical approaches. Surgery-related complications and adverse effects will be evaluated as safety outcomes. A single assessor at each participating hospital, blinded to group allocation, will assess the enrolled participants at baseline, 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.DiscussionThis trial is designed to determine whether interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy is clinically comparable to microscopic discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations. All efforts will be made to reduce bias, including adequate sample sizes, blinded analyses, and multicenter prospective registration. The outcomes will inform practice, providing the evidence needed for the use of interlaminar full-endoscopic over microscopic discectomy by confirming the potential of this technique to improve patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes.Trial registrationClinical Research Information Service; cris.nih.go.kr. (KCT0006277); protocol version (v1, June 8, 2021)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document