Adaptive design theory and implementation using SAS and R Mark Chang (2007) ISBN 1584889624; 440 pages; £48.99, $89.95 Chapman & Hall/CRC; http://www.crcpress.com

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-186
Author(s):  
Gerd Rosenkranz
Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1163
Author(s):  
Myeong-Jun Lee

This study explores the characteristics of and changes in Korean landscape architects’ attitudes toward ecological design strategies and theories over the last three decades. Methodologically, this study includes a literature review and incorporates data from case studies and site visits. It discusses Seoul-specific contexts regarding environmental conditions, urban morphology, administrative agency, and design theory and practice. It redefines ecological parks, expanding their scope using physical and non-physical ecological processes. Considering this redefinition, this study categorizes the five main attitudes of contemporary Korean landscape architects towards ecological design: providing wildlife habitat, constructing aesthetic experiences, the phasing strategy, developing environmental learning programs, and designers’ metaphoric expression. Through these attitudes, this study chronologically explores gradual and constant changes in design strategies and the discourse on ecological design. Specifically, in the 1990s, landscape architects emphasized the representation of ecosystems by constructing wildlife habitats. In the early 2000s, ecological parks were artistically designed as urban parks by reusing post-industrial landscapes. Around the 2010s, landscape architects developed resilient and adaptive design strategies to flexibly respond to uncertain changes in natural and urban ecological circumstances. Since the 2010s, landscape architects have continually expanded the scope of ecology to cover physical, non-physical, urban, and social infrastructures, including public transportation, as well as political, social, and cultural structures and virtual and augmented landscapes. This study can contribute to the field literature while adding a valuable overview of the understudied Korean context.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip Roös ◽  
David Jones

<p>An astonishing intense fascination is under way in the design sciences, where the words of ‘living structures’ and ‘adaptive’ are being linked with ‘technology.  In part fuelled by the emergence of the Anthropocene discourse, these words are inspiring authoritative new insights into the workings of wild nature, humanity’s position and responsibility to planet Earth, and is being articulated through the rapidly increasing science of pattern theory. The new terminology is provoking the design sciences to seriously consider technologically-informed innovation in design and new possibilities including living technology, morphogenetic sequences, self-organisation, generative codes, biophilia, biomimetics and regenerative-adaptive design, opening the doors to a new era in ecology-informed design. The idea of design as an adaptive and transformation process, is at the core of the whole systems theory pioneered by Alexander in <em>A Pattern Language</em> (1977) and <em>The Nature of Order</em> (2001-2005).  Alexander positioned this hypothesis in generative codes supported by morphogenetic sequences.  Drawing upon Alexander’s <em>The Nature of Order</em> (2001-2005), this paper advances a regenerative-adaptive design theory (Roӧs, 2016), towards a holistic integrated design method that incorporates the principles of regenerative design with an adaptive pattern language that re-establishes human wholeness with nature and offers relevant strategies towards resilience; in essence creating a living technology. </p>


Author(s):  
Akin O. Kazakci

We present a personal design assistant, DesigNAR, aiming at actively supporting designing. The assistant cooperate with the designer by observing the external design representation on which he is working, by making suggestions to him on how to further elaborate this representation and adapting its (suggestion) behaviour according to the designer’s reactions to those suggestions. DesigNAR implements a Non-Axiomatic Reasoning system on fluid concept representations. This enables DesigNAR to be a situated, creative and adaptive design agent using a constructive memory and grounding of concepts. As discussed in the paper, these features make DesigNAR compatible with the C-K design theory and its C/K/E extension.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document