Do adaptive cycles of floodplain vegetation response to inundation differ among vegetation communities?

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 553-566
Author(s):  
Rajesh Thapa ◽  
Martin C. Thoms ◽  
Michael Reid ◽  
Melissa Parsons
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Thapa ◽  
M. C. Thoms ◽  
M. Parsons ◽  
M. Reid

Abstract. Flooding is a key driver of floodplain vegetation productivity. Adaptive cycles provide a model for examining the productivity of semi-arid floodplain vegetation in response to hydrology. We examined the response of vegetation productivity (measured as NDVI) through a hypothesised adaptive cycle to determine whether the cycle repeats over time and how it is affected by differently sized flood events. The area of floodplain inundation was associated with an adaptive cycle that repeated in four flood events through the following phases: wetting (exploitation phase), wet (conservation phase), drying (release phase) and dry (reorganisation phase). Vegetation productivity responses corresponded to these phases. The area and quality of floodplain vegetation productivity followed the hypothesised pattern of higher-quality vegetation vigour in the wetting and wet phases, lower vigour in the drying phase and lowest vigour in the dry phase. There were more transitions between NDVI classes in the wet phase, which was dominated by two-way transitions. Overall, the wetting, wet and drying phases were dominated by smaller-probability class changes, whereas in the dry phase, higher-probability class changes were more prominent. Although the four flood events exhibited an adaptive cycle the duration of the adaptive-cycle phases, and the nature of vegetation productivity response, differed with the character of the flood event. Vegetation response in two of the adaptive-cycle phases – the release and reorganisation phases – were as hypothesised, but in the exploitation and conservation phases, changes in vegetation productivity were more dynamic. The character of vegetation response through the adaptive cycle also indicates that semi-arid floodplain vegetation productivity is more vulnerable to changing state during the conservation and release phases and not during the exploitation and reorganisation phases as resilience theory suggests. Overall, the adaptive cycle represents a new model to improve our understanding of the complexity of change in semi-arid floodplain vegetation productivity through cycles of flooding and drying. Changes in vegetation productivity could initiate structural changes in floodplain vegetation communities, with commensurate influences on floodplain sediment dynamics.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 807-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Thapa ◽  
M. C. Thoms ◽  
M. Parsons ◽  
M. Reid

Abstract. Flooding is a key driver of floodplain vegetation productivity. Adaptive cycles provide a model for examining the productivity of semi-arid floodplain vegetation in response to hydrology. We examined the response of vegetation productivity (measured as NDVI) through a hypothesized adaptive cycle to determine if the cycle repeats over time and how it is affected by different sized flood events. The area of floodplain inundation was associated with an adaptive cycle that repeated in four flood events through phases of wetting (exploitation phase), wet (conservation phase), drying (release phase) and dry (reorganisation phase). Vegetation productivity responses corresponded to these phases. The area and quality of floodplain vegetation productivity followed the hypothesised pattern of higher quality vegetation vigour in the wetting and wet phases, lower vigour in the drying phase and lowest vigour in the dry phase. There were more transitions between NDVI classes in the wet phase, which was dominated by two-way transitions. Overall, the wetting, wet and drying phases were dominated by smaller probability class changes, whereas in the dry phase higher probability class changes were more prominent. Although the four flood events exhibited an adaptive cycle the duration of the adaptive cycle phases, and the nature of vegetation productivity response, differed with the character of the flood event. Vegetation response in two of the adaptive cycle phases – the release and reorganisation phases – were as hypothesised, but in the exploitation and conservation phases changes in vegetation productivity were more dynamic. The character of vegetation response through the adaptive cycle also indicates that semi-arid floodplain vegetation productivity is more vulnerable to changing state during the conservation and release phases and not during the exploitation and reorganisation phases as resilience theory suggests. Overall, the adaptive cycle represents a new model to improve our understanding of the complexity of change in semi-arid floodplain vegetation productivity through cycles of flooding and drying.


2021 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 107429
Author(s):  
Sara Shaeri Karimi ◽  
Neil Saintilan ◽  
Li Wen ◽  
Jonathan Cox ◽  
Roozbeh Valavi

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bhattacharjee ◽  
D. Haukos ◽  
J. Neaville

2013 ◽  
pp. 133-135
Author(s):  
L. G. Naumova ◽  
E. Z. Baisheva ◽  
V. B. Martynenko

Bryansk syntaxonomic center (Mirkin, Ermakov, 2010), which includes a group of researchers, students by prof. Bulahov A. D., characterized by high activity. Peer-reviewed monograph summarizes studies of the vegetation of the Bryansk region in the context of the choice of subject matter. In the text of the monograph a brief "Foreword", Chapter 2 theoretical and 3 parts, which is characterized by rare, reference and moss vegetation communities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document