The effects of medical malpractice tort reform on physician supply an analysis of legislative changes from 2009 to 2016

2020 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 540-575
Author(s):  
Charles L. Baum
Author(s):  
David A. Hyman ◽  
Charles M. Silver ◽  
Bernard S. Black ◽  
Myungho Paik
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 405-419
Author(s):  
Jing Liu ◽  
David A. Hyman

This article evaluates the effects of medical malpractice reform on claiming, malpractice premiums, physician supply, and defensive medicine. We conclude that damage caps materially reduce claim frequency, payouts per claim, and total payouts. The effects of damage caps on malpractice premiums, physician supply, and defensive medicine are more modest. It is difficult to quantify the impact of reforms other than damage caps—partly because reforms are typically adopted as a package deal, and partly because of the limitations of the available data. We close by identifying three areas that would benefit from more research.


1992 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail Javitt ◽  
Elaine Lu

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 203-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Hyman ◽  
Charles Silver ◽  
Bernard Black ◽  
Myungho Paik
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Fruchter

The recent and continual call for tort reform has many scholars proposing alternatives to current U.S. medical malpractice law. Most commentators limit their discussions to variations of the two Anglo Saxon theories of liability — negligence and strict liability. Little has been written examining the legal treatment of medical malpractice in other cultures. This article compares and contrasts Jewish and American medical malpractice law, examining both the contemporary and ancient sources of the law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document