scholarly journals Re: Clinical implementation of routine screening for fetal trisomies in the UK NHS: cell-free DNA test contingent on results from first-trimester combined test

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 788-789
Author(s):  
A. Perales-Marín ◽  
J. Morales-Roselló ◽  
R. Quiroga
2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (20) ◽  
pp. 2476-2482 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Gil ◽  
M. Brik ◽  
C. Casanova ◽  
R. Martin-Alonso ◽  
M. Verdejo ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
E. Gottardi ◽  
J.‐M. Costa ◽  
P. Kleinfinger ◽  
L. Lohmann ◽  
J. Carrara ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1474-1481
Author(s):  
Nicola Persico ◽  
Simona Boito ◽  
Paolo Volpe ◽  
Benedetta Ischia ◽  
Mattia Gentile ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ismail Tekesin

Abstract Introduction Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing is increasingly used as a screening method not only for trisomy (T) 21 but also for T18 and T13, sex chromosome anomalies (SCA) and microdeletions. Based on cases with a positive cfDNA result in our specialised prenatal practice, this study aims to characterise the usage of cfDNA testing and to estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) in routine practice in Germany. Patients and Methods In this retrospective study we analysed the data of all pregnant women with a positive cfDNA result seen between 09/2013 and 12/2019. Women were either referred due to the positive result or the test was initiated in our practice. The primary parameter of interest was the concordance of cfDNA tests with confirmatory genetic testing. Results We encountered 81 cases with a positive cfDNA test (T21: 49.4%; T18: 9.9%; T13: 8.6%; SCA: 22.2%; 22q12del: 8.6%). The PPV was 95.0% for T21, but considerably lower for T18 (55.6%) and T13 (28.6%). For SCAs it was 23.1% and no case with DiGeorge syndrome was confirmed. 63% of the patients had not received a fetal anomaly scan before cfDNA testing. In first-trimester fetuses with a cfDNA test predicting an autosomal aneuploidy, fetal anomalies were detected in 90.3% of the cases. No false positive case had an abnormal US result. Conclusions Despite the excellent specificity of cfDNA tests, the PPV for aneuploidies other than T21 is low in routine practice. In discordance with the current guidelines, cfDNA test is often used without a previous detailed anomaly scan. Our data provide valuable information to assist patient counselling and shared decision making.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 139-143
Author(s):  
Sarang Younesi ◽  
Shahram Savad ◽  
Soudeh Ghafouri-Fard ◽  
Mohammad Mahdi Taheri-Amin ◽  
Pourandokht Saadati ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 902-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Lu ◽  
Devereux N. Saller ◽  
Luanne M. Fraer ◽  
Beatrice A. Chen

Author(s):  
Ashley N. Battarbee ◽  
Neeta L. Vora

In a prospective, multicenter blinded study at 35 international centers, the Noninvasive Examination of Trisomy (NEXT) study evaluated the performance of cell-free DNA screening for fetal trisomy compared to standard first trimester screening with nuchal translucency and serum analytes in a routine prenatal population. Among the 15,841 women who had standard screening and cell-free DNA analysis with neonatal outcome data, there were 68 chromosomal abnormalities (1 in 236). Of these, 38 were Trisomy 21 (1 in 417). Cell-free DNA analysis had a higher area under the curve (AUC) for trisomy 21, compared to standard screening (0.999 vs. 0.958, p = 0.001). Cell-free DNA analysis also had greater sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value compared to standard screening for trisomy 21, 18, and 13. While cell-free DNA analysis cannot detect all chromosome abnormalities, it performed better than standard screening for detection of trisomies 21, 18, and 13 in a routine population including low- and high-risk women.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document