scholarly journals Validation of prediction model for successful vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery based on sonographic assessment of hysterotomy scar

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Baranov ◽  
K. Å. Salvesen ◽  
O. Vikhareva
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Sonographic Assessment

scholarly journals Validation of a Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Prediction Model in Women With Two Prior Cesarean Deliveries

2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 948-952 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torri D. Metz ◽  
Amanda A. Allshouse ◽  
Allison M. Faucett ◽  
William A. Grobman
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Cesarean Deliveries

Validation of the Prediction Model for Success of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-33
Author(s):  
M.M. Costantine ◽  
K. Fox ◽  
B.D. Byers ◽  
J. Mateus ◽  
L.M. Ghulmiyyah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean

588: Validation of the admission prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

2018 ◽  
Vol 218 (1) ◽  
pp. S352
Author(s):  
Thoa Ha ◽  
Stephanie L. Gaw ◽  
Alexandra L. Havard ◽  
Melanie M. Maykin ◽  
Jenny Mei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean

Validation of the close-to-delivery prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a Middle Eastern cohort

2016 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdel Aziz ◽  
Amal Abd Rabbo ◽  
Waleed A. Sayed Ahmed ◽  
Rasha E. Khamees ◽  
Khaled A. Atwa
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Middle Eastern ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean

Simple, Validated Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery Prediction Model for Use at the Time of Admission

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-159
Author(s):  
T.D. Metz ◽  
G.J. Stoddard ◽  
E. Henry ◽  
M. Jackson ◽  
C. Holmgren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Time Of Admission

scholarly journals Development of a Modified Score System as Prediction Model for Successful Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan‐Ping Xing ◽  
Xin‐Ying Qi ◽  
Xue‐Zhen Wang ◽  
Feng‐Zhen Yang
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Score System

Validation of the Prediction Model for Success of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery

2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (5) ◽  
pp. 1029-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maged M. Costantine ◽  
Karin Fox ◽  
Benjamin D. Byers ◽  
Julio Mateus ◽  
Labib M. Ghulmiyyah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean

scholarly journals Validation of a Prediction Model for Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery Reveals Unexpected Success in a Diverse American Population

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. e31-e38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Maykin ◽  
Amanda Mularz ◽  
Lydia Lee ◽  
Stephanie Valderramos
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Ethnically Diverse ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Maternal Fetal Medicine ◽  
Trial Of Labor ◽  
Network Prediction

Objective To investigate the validity of a prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC) in an ethnically diverse population. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of women admitted at a single academic institution for a trial of labor after cesarean from May 2007 to January 2015. Individual predicted success rates were calculated using the Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network prediction model. Participants were stratified into three probability-of-success groups: low (<35%), moderate (35–65%), and high (>65%). The actual versus predicted success rates were compared. Results In total, 568 women met inclusion criteria. Successful VBAC occurred in 402 (71%), compared with a predicted success rate of 66% (p = 0.016). Actual VBAC success rates were higher than predicted by the model in the low (57 vs. 29%; p < 0.001) and moderate (61 vs. 52%; p = 0.003) groups. In the high probability group, the observed and predicted VBAC rates were the same (79%). Conclusion When the predicted success rate was above 65%, the model was highly accurate. In contrast, for women with predicted success rates <35%, actual VBAC rates were nearly twofold higher in our population, suggesting that they should not be discouraged by a low prediction score.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document