Discovering Fundamental Categorical Transformations: Adjoint Functors

2008 ◽  
pp. 109-145
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Marquis
Keyword(s):  
1971 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Kock

The notion of commutative monad was defined by the author in [4]. The content of the present paper may briefly be stated: The category of algebras for a commutative monad can in a canonical way be made into a closed category, the two adjoint functors connecting the category of algebras with the base category are in a canonical way closed functors, and the front- and end-adjunctions are closed transformations. (The terms ‘Closed Category’ etc. are from the paper [2] by Eilenberg and Kelly). In particular, the monad itself is a ‘closed monad’; this fact was also proved in [4].


Author(s):  
Laurent Poinsot ◽  
Hans E. Porst

The category of internal coalgebras in a cocomplete category [Formula: see text] with respect to a variety [Formula: see text] is equivalent to the category of left adjoint functors from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text]. This can be seen best when considering such coalgebras as finite coproduct preserving functors from [Formula: see text], the dual of the Lawvere theory of [Formula: see text], into [Formula: see text]: coalgebras are restrictions of left adjoints and any such left adjoint is the left Kan extension of a coalgebra along the embedding of [Formula: see text] into [Formula: see text]. Since [Formula: see text]-coalgebras in the variety [Formula: see text] for rings [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are nothing but left [Formula: see text]-, right [Formula: see text]-bimodules, the equivalence above generalizes the Eilenberg–Watts theorem and all its previous generalizations. By generalizing and strengthening Bergman’s completeness result for categories of internal coalgebras in varieties, we also prove that the category of coalgebras in a locally presentable category [Formula: see text] is locally presentable and comonadic over [Formula: see text] and, hence, complete in particular. We show, moreover, that Freyd’s canonical constructions of internal coalgebras in a variety define left adjoint functors. Special instances of the respective right adjoints appear in various algebraic contexts and, in the case where [Formula: see text] is a commutative variety, are coreflectors from the category [Formula: see text] into [Formula: see text].


1976 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Fitz-Gerald

Green's relations are essential for “co-ordinatizing” semigroups. Jacqueline Klasa, in applying cognate ideas to categories [4, 5], has shown that divisibility in suitably-behaved categories may be described in terms of subobjects and quotients.Here it is shown that adjoint functors which are onto objects preserve divisibility (in a certain sense). The inclusion functor of the category of sets into the category R of binary relations is such a functor. A slight modification of its right adjoint allows the representation of R as a full subcategory in a category CSL of complete semilattice morphisms.


1974 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Heller
Keyword(s):  

Filomat ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (15) ◽  
pp. 4763-4779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Rodríguez-López

The concept of fuzzy uniform structure was introduced in [7] as a fuzzy counterpart of the concept of gauge associated with a uniformity. In fact, the category of fuzzy uniform structures is isomorphic to that of uniform spaces. Here, we introduce two other concepts of fuzzy uniform structures which allow to establish two categories isomorphic to the categories of probabilistic uniform spaces and Lowen uniform spaces, respectively. This sheds light on the relationship between these fuzzy uniformities and classical uniformities. Furthermore, we obtain a factorization of Lowen?s adjoint functors ?* and ? which establish a relationship between the categories of uniform spaces and Lowen uniform spaces.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document