Social Cognition and Power: Some Cognitive Consequences of Social Structure as a Source of Control Deprivation

Author(s):  
Eric Dépret ◽  
Susan T. Fiske
1990 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 148 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Morgan ◽  
Michael L. Schwalbe

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaston Godin ◽  
Paschal Sheeran ◽  
Mark Conner ◽  
Ariane Bélanger-Gravel ◽  
Maria Cecília B. J. Gallani ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Fariza Azkiya Ali

This paper study explains about some fundamental theories of Critical Discourse Analysis such as focus on dominance relations by elite groups and institutions as they are being ordained and the overt sociopolitical stance of discourse analysis. Context social structure: Situations of discursive interaction are similarly part or constitutive of social structure; for example, a press conference may be a typical repetition of organizations and media institutions. That is, “local” and more “global” contexts are closely related, and both exercise constraints on discourse. Personal and social cognition: Language users as social actors have both personal and social cognition: personal memories, knowledge and opinions, as well as those shared with members of the group or culture as a whole. Both types of cognition influence interaction 006 and discourse of individual members, whereas shared “social representations” govern the collective actions of a group.


1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert B. Cairns ◽  
Jane E. Perrin ◽  
Beverley D. Cairns

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
fariza azkiya ali

This paper study explains about some fundamental theories of Critical Discourse Analysis such as focus on dominance relations by elite groups and institutions as they are being ordained and the overt sociopolitical stance of discourse analysis. Context social structure: Situations of discursive interaction are similarly part or constitutive of social structure; for example, a press conference may be a typical repetition of organizations and media institutions. That is, “local” and more “global” contexts are closely related, and both exercise constraints on discourse. Personal and social cognition: Language users as social actors have both personal and social cognition: personal memories, knowledge and opinions, as well as those shared with members of the group or culture as a whole. Both types of cognition influence interaction 006 and discourse of individual members, whereas shared “social representations” govern the collective actions of a group.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-408
Author(s):  
Wiesław Baryła ◽  
Bogdan Wojciszke

Not much is known about the cognitive consequences of success and failure, and there is no comprehensive theory explaining their aftermath. Building on a dual-perspective model of social cognition, we offer such a preliminary theory that assumes that experiencing success induces an agentic perspective, whereas experiencing failure induces a recipient perspective. We present two field studies of persons failing or succeeding at their naturally occurring goals. The studies found that the experience of success was accompanied by heightened accessibility and use of agentic content. The experience of failure resulted in lowered mood and self-esteem.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Whiten

Abstract The authors do the field of cultural evolution a service by exploring the role of non-social cognition in human cumulative technological culture, truly neglected in comparison with socio-cognitive abilities frequently assumed to be the primary drivers. Some specifics of their delineation of the critical factors are problematic, however. I highlight recent chimpanzee–human comparative findings that should help refine such analyses.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Robertson

Abstract Osiurak and Reynaud (O&R) claim that research into the origin of cumulative technological culture has been too focused on social cognition and has consequently neglected the importance of uniquely human reasoning capacities. This commentary raises two interrelated theoretical concerns about O&R's notion of technical-reasoning capacities, and suggests how these concerns might be met.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document