1997 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 518-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Carr ◽  
Christopher Miles

Two experiments are reported in each of which subjects were required to recall spoken consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) syllable lists serially. Both experiments contrasted the effects of a rhyming suffix and an alliterative suffix on recall of the terminal list item. A rhyming suffix reliably attenuated the normally robust suffix effect; an alliterative suffix did not. The finding points to the importance of the location rather than the quantity of phonological repetition in determining the size of the suffix effect. In line with Treiman and Danis (1988), it is argued that the onset (C) and rime (VC) components of CVC syllables may exist as separate entites within short-term acoustic memory. This, coupled with the superior durability of the rime component within acoustic memory, affords the subject a greater probability of recalling correctly the terminal list item in the rhyming suffix condition.


2003 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 2311-2311
Author(s):  
Michael McPherson ◽  
Igor Ostrovskii ◽  
M. A. Breazeale

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 (11) ◽  
pp. 596-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Ingebrigtsen ◽  
R. A. Cohen ◽  
R. W. Mountain

Author(s):  
Travis Wade ◽  
Bernd Möbius

AbstractHumans recognize previously heard spoken words better when repetitions of the words involve identical productions than productions by a different speaker. Such findings have been taken as evidence that perceived instances of words or sub-lexical units are stored in a detailed form in memory, and that collections of these memory traces comprise or are linked to mental lexical representations. This study tested a different possibility, that detailed acoustic memory occurs during spoken language processing but does not necessarily correspond to words or other traditionally defined units. Two experiments examined lexical access and recognition memory for continuous speech sequences, extracted from a spoken language corpus, as a function of sequence length and onset phase (with respect to word onset), and speaker. Qualitatively different patterns between word identification and memory performance based on these three variables provide little evidence for a role of the word level of representation in memory for the sequences, and suggest that memory-based processing may more independent of this level than has been assumed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document