XEN Gel Stent: The Solution Designed by AqueSys®

2013 ◽  
pp. 189-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa I. Vera ◽  
Christopher Horvath
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram Ponnusamy ◽  
Van Nguyen ◽  
Jella A. An

Abstract Background To compare 6 month outcomes of bleb needling performed in the clinic vs. the operating room (OR) in adult glaucoma patients with failed bleb. Methods A retrospective case series of 47 eyes from 41 glaucoma patients who received needling with mitomycin C (MMC) of scarred bleb from prior bleb-forming procedures in clinic (32 eyes) vs. the OR (15 eyes), including trabeculectomy (14 eyes), ExPress shunt (16 eyes), and ab-interno XEN gel stent (17 eyes). The primary outcome was needling success, defined as IOP ≤ 18 mmHg on 0 glaucoma medications without requiring an additional IOP lowering procedure within 6 months after needling. Results At 6 months, bleb needling success rate was similar when performed in the clinic vs. in the OR (28% vs. 20%, P = 0.54). Success rate was not statistically different in patients with prior trabeculectomy, ExPress shunt, and XEN gel stent (29% vs. 38% vs. 12%, P = 0.26). When comparing clinic vs. the OR needling procedures at 6 months, there was no difference in mean IOP (14.2 vs. 14.9 mmHg, P = 0.73), mean glaucoma medications (1.4 vs. 1.7, P = 0.69), additional IOP-lowering procedure rate (16% vs. 27%, P = 0.37), or complication rate (0% vs. 7%, P = 0.32). Conclusion Bleb needling with MMC in clinic may be a safe and effective way to revise failed bleb after trabeculectomy, ExPress shunt, and XEN gel stent procedures when compared to needling in the OR.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonal Dangda ◽  
Jake E. Radell ◽  
Maria A. Mavrommatis ◽  
Rachel Lee ◽  
Anna Do ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 864-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayesha Karimi ◽  
Marina Hopes ◽  
Keith R. Martin ◽  
Dan Lindfield

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37
Author(s):  
Sonal Dangda ◽  
Maria V. Castanos ◽  
Anna Do ◽  
Joseph F. Panarelli
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Ike K. Ahmed ◽  
Matthew B. Schlenker ◽  
Jeb Alden Ong
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa Wałek ◽  
Joanna Przeździecka-Dołyk ◽  
Iwona Helemejko ◽  
Marta Misiuk-Hojło

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative management with 5-fluorouracil injections after XEN Gel Stent implantation. Methods Prospective real-world evidence study included 39 eyes (of 36 patients) with primary open-angle glaucoma without previous glaucoma surgery and with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma progression, or intolerance to IOP-lowering therapy. Patients underwent mitomycin C-augmented XEN implantation either as a stand-alone procedure or combined with cataract extraction. 5-Fluorouracil subconjunctival injections were a first-choice therapy for bleb failure and were administered according to predetermined criteria (analogous to pro re nata regimen in age-related macular degeneration treatment). Primary outcome was unqualified success, defined as postoperative IOP < 18 mmHg and > 20% reduction from medicated baseline without any antiglaucoma medications and no detected glaucoma progression. Results At median follow-up of 8 months (range 3–24 months), IOP decreased from a medicated baseline value of 23 mmHg (95% CI 21–24 mmHg) to 13 mmHg (95% CI 12–15 mmHg) and number of medications decreased from 3 (95% CI 2–3) to 0 (p < 0.0001 for both). Median number of 5-fluorouracil injections per eye was 3 (95% CI 2–3), and median time to first injection was 0.5 months (95% CI 0.25–3 months) after surgery. Thirteen eyes (33.3%) underwent ≥ 1 needling, and surgical revision was performed in three cases (7.7%). The primary outcome measure, which allows performing additional procedures, was achieved in 27 eyes (69%). Conclusions 5-Fluorouracil subconjunctival injections are safe and effective in postoperative management of bleb failure after XEN implantation and represent a viable alternative to other methods.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Midha ◽  
Kevin Gillmann ◽  
Ankita Chaudhary ◽  
André Mermoud ◽  
Kaweh Mansouri

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document