The Justice Motive: History, Theory, and Research

The Marketing-Systems-as-the-Public-Good framework proposed in this article outlines the general principles of interpreting change in marketing systems. The framework advances a view of purposeful temporal change based on collective practices that a) identify, develop and maintain key common resources; b) initiate public-private asset transitions; c) facilitate contributory participation of market actors in marketing system processes; and d) perpetuate attenuating mechanisms. These processes construct the system as the public good with non-excludable and non-subtractable (dis)benefits. The drive for further change arises when the system’s overarching structures infuse value creation practices with macromotive-based meaningfulness (e.g. the justice motive) which differentially resonates in market actors’ lived experiences, who through ongoing localized socio-political discourses and contestation undertake to correct perceived justice digressions. The case of the historical evolution of the Uzbek Bozor Marketing System illustrates the key elements of the proposed framework.

Download Full-text

The Justice Motive in Adolescence and Young Adulthood

10.4324/9780203575802 ◽

2004 ◽

Cited By ~ 46

Author(s):

Claudia Dalbert

Keyword(s):

Young Adulthood ◽

Justice Motive ◽

Adolescence And Young Adulthood

Download Full-text

Towards a Theory of Marketing Systems as the Public Good

10.26686/wgtn.12786647.v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Djavlonbek Kadirov

Keyword(s):

Public Good ◽

Value Creation ◽

Lived Experiences ◽

Temporal Change ◽

Marketing System ◽

Perceived Justice ◽

The Public ◽

Political Discourses ◽

Justice Motive ◽

Marketing Systems

© The Author(s) 2018. The Marketing-Systems-as-the-Public-Good framework proposed in this article outlines the general principles of interpreting change in marketing systems. The framework advances a view of purposeful temporal change based on collective practices that a) identify, develop and maintain key common resources; b) initiate public-private asset transitions; c) facilitate contributory participation of market actors in marketing system processes; and d) perpetuate attenuating mechanisms. These processes construct the system as the public good with non-excludable and non-subtractable (dis)benefits. The drive for further change arises when the system’s overarching structures infuse value creation practices with macromotive-based meaningfulness (e.g. the justice motive) which differentially resonates in market actors’ lived experiences, who through ongoing localized socio-political discourses and contestation undertake to correct perceived justice digressions. The case of the historical evolution of the Uzbek Bozor Marketing System illustrates the key elements of the proposed framework.

Download Full-text