Challenging Mathematical Insights into Masonry Domes Over the Centuries

Author(s):  
Raffaella Pavani
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Nicola A. Nodargi ◽  
Paolo Bisegna

AbstractThe static limit analysis of axially symmetric masonry domes subject to pseudo-static seismic forces is addressed. The stress state in the dome is represented by the shell stress resultants (normal-force tensor, bending-moment tensor, and shear-force vector) on the dome mid-surface. The classical differential equilibrium equations of shells are resorted to for imposing the equilibrium of the dome. Heyman’s assumptions of infinite compressive and vanishing tensile strength, alongside with cohesive-frictional shear response, are adopted for imposing the admissibility of the stress state. A finite difference method is proposed for the numerical discretization of the problem, based on the use of two staggered rectangular grids in the parameter space generating the dome mid-surface. The resulting discrete static limit analysis problem results to be a second-order cone programming problem, to be effectively solved by available convex optimization softwares. In addition to a convergence analysis, numerical simulations are presented, dealing with the parametric analysis of the collapse capacity under seismic forces of spherical and ogival domes with parameterized geometry. In particular, the influence that the shear response of masonry material and the distribution of horizontal forces along the height of the dome have on the collapse capacity is explored. The obtained results, that are new in the literature, show the computational merit of the proposed method, and quantitatively shed light on the seismic resistance of masonry domes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4268
Author(s):  
Mario Como

The paper deals with the insurgence of the thrust, together with its valuation, in masonry domes, giving special attention to the Brunelleschi’s Dome in Florence. After a recalling of the kinematical approach in the context of the Heyman masonry model, the thrust of Brunelleschi’s Dome is estimated as the maximum of the set of all the kinematical ones. Comparisons are made with other valuations made by the usual, but less accurate, statical approach. The knowledge of the thrust allows an evaluation of the stresses acting in the supporting piers: their base sections are all compressed, with level stresses sufficiently low. This result shows the extraordinary conception of Filippo Brunelleschi’s Dome and the favorable design of the pillar sections and of the drum positioning, due, perhaps, to Arnolfo di Cambio or to the succeeding Masters.


2015 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 297-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Fabbrocino ◽  
Ilenia Farina ◽  
Valentino Paolo Berardi ◽  
A.J.M. Ferreira ◽  
Fernando Fraternali

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anahita Khodadadi ◽  
Hoshyar Nooshin ◽  
Zohreh Bozorgmehri ◽  
Mahmoud Golabchi
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 227 (9) ◽  
pp. 2415-2425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Coccia ◽  
Mario Como ◽  
Fabio Di Carlo

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Sajtos ◽  
O. Gáspár ◽  
A. Sipos
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Stefano Bennati ◽  
Riccardo Barsotti ◽  
Francesco Barsi
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document