Group Consensus Decision-Making Methods with DHHFLPRs, LPOs and Self-confident DHLPRs

2020 ◽  
pp. 95-152
Author(s):  
Xunjie Gou ◽  
Zeshui Xu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Consensus ◽  
Consensus Decision Making ◽  
Consensus Decision

A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making.

1989 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. 834-839 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry K. Michaelsen ◽  
Warren E. Watson ◽  
Robert H. Black
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Consensus ◽  
Versus Group ◽  
Consensus Decision Making ◽  
Consensus Decision

scholarly journals Consensus Decision Making by Fish

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (22) ◽  
pp. 1773-1777 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J.T. Sumpter ◽  
Jens Krause ◽  
Richard James ◽  
Iain D. Couzin ◽  
Ashley J.W. Ward
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Consensus Decision Making ◽  
Consensus Decision

Consensus Decision Making in Random Forests

2015 ◽  
pp. 347-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raja Khurram Shahzad ◽  
Mehwish Fatima ◽  
Niklas Lavesson ◽  
Martin Boldt
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Random Forests ◽  
Consensus Decision Making ◽  
Consensus Decision

scholarly journals PERAN PERAWAT DALAM MENGANALISIS BUDAYA ORGANISASI DAN BUDAYA KESELAMATAN PASIEN DI RUMAH SAKIT

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhaini Atmayana Purba
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Consensus Decision Making ◽  
Consensus Decision

Latar belakang : Membangun budaya keselamatan pasien merupakan langkah awal dalam pengembangan keselamatan pasien. Budaya keselamatan pasien di rumah sakit merupakan bagian dari budaya organisasi, sehingga pengkajian tentang budaya organisasi diperlukan untuk menjadi panduan dalam mengembangkan keselamatan pasien. Tujuan : Tujuan penulisan ini yaitu mengidenifikasi peran perawat dalam menganalisis budaya organisasi dan budaya keselamatan pasien di rumah sakit. Metode : Metode yang digunakan merupakan literatur review atau suatu perbandingan atau analisis antara satu jurnal dengan jurnal lainnya dari berbagai sumber seperti referensi jurnal, buku teks dan e-book. Hasil : Tipe budaya Clan didapatkan sebagai tipe budaya organisasi yang dominan sekaligus kuat dan menjadi panduan untuk melakukan perubahan dalam organisasi khususnya dalam pengembangan keselamatan pasien. Rencana tindak lanjut dibuat dan disepakati dalam Consensus Decision Making Group (CDMG) untuk mengartikulasikan unsur keselamatan pasien dalam visi dan misi organisasi serta penguatan budaya keselamatan melalui pelatihan keselamatan pasien bagi seluruh staf. Kesimpulan : . Rencana dalam tindak lanjut dibuat dan disepakati dalam Consensus Decision Making Group (CDMG) untuk mengartikulasikan unsur keselamatan pasien dalam visi dan misi organisasi serta penguatan budaya keselamatan melalui pelatihan keselamatan pasien bagi seluruh staf dan juga perawat.

scholarly journals Communication speeds up but impairs the consensus decision in a dyadic colour estimation task

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 191974
Author(s):  
Liutao Yu ◽  
Chundi Wang ◽  
Si Wu ◽  
Da-Hui Wang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
Consensus Formation ◽  
Exact Role ◽  
Estimation Task ◽  
Consensus Decision Making ◽  
Consensus Decision ◽  
Better Than

Communication plays an important role in consensus decision-making which pervades our daily life. However, the exact role of communication in consensus formation is not clear. Here, to study the effects of communication on consensus formation, we designed a dyadic colour estimation task, where a pair of isolated participants repeatedly estimated the colours of discs until they reached a consensus or completed eight estimations, either with or without communication. We show that participants’ estimates gradually approach each other, reaching towards a consensus, and these are enhanced with communication. We also show that dyadic consensus estimation is on average better than individual estimation. Surprisingly, consensus estimation without communication generally outperforms that with communication, indicating that communication impairs the improvement of consensus estimation. However, without communication, it takes longer to reach a consensus. Moreover, participants who partially cooperate with each other tend to result in better overall consensus. Taken together, we have identified the effect of communication on the dynamics of consensus formation, and the results may have implications on group decision-making in general.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document