scholarly journals Residuated Operators and Dedekind–MacNeille Completion

Author(s):  
Ivan Chajda ◽  
Helmut Länger ◽  
Jan Paseka
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sándor Radeleczki

AbstractG. Czédli proved that the blocks of any compatible tolerance T of a lattice L can be ordered in such a way that they form a lattice L/T called the factor lattice of L modulo T. Here we show that the Dedekind–MacNeille completion of the lattice L/T is isomorphic to the concept lattice of the context (L, L, R), where R stands for the reflexive weak ordered relation $$ \mathord {\le } \circ T$$ ≤ ∘ T . Weak ordered relations constitute the generalization of the ordered relations introduced by S. Valentini. Reflexive weak ordered relations can be characterized as compatible reflexive relations $$R\subseteq L^{2}$$ R ⊆ L 2 satisfying $$R=\ \mathord {\le } \circ R\circ \mathord {\le } $$ R = ≤ ∘ R ∘ ≤ .


2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 553-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongxi Zhang ◽  
Qingguo Li
Keyword(s):  

Order ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-148
Author(s):  
Philippe Baldy ◽  
Jutta Mitas

1996 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. K. Truss

The intuition behind the notion of a cycle-free partial order (CFPO) is that it should be a partial ordering (X, ≤ ) in which for any sequence of points (x0, x1;…, xn–1) with n ≤ 4 such that xi is comparable with xi+1 for each i (indices taken modulo n) there are i and j with j ╪ i, i + 1 such that xj lies between xi and xi+1. As its turn out however this fails to capture the intended class, and a more involved definition, in terms of the ‘Dedekind–MacNeille completion’ of X was given by Warren[5]. An alternative definition involving the idea of a betweenness relation was proposed by P. M. Neumann [1]. It is the purpose of this paper to clarify the connections between these definitions, and indeed between the ideas of semi-linear order (or ‘tree’), CFPO, and the betweenness relations described in [1]. In addition I shall tackle the issue of the axiomatizability of the class of CFPOs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 303 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Medina ◽  
M. Ojeda-Aciego ◽  
J. Pócs ◽  
E. Ramírez-Poussa

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 222-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Harding

AbstractProblem 36 of the third edition of Birkhoff's Lattice theory [2] asks whether the MacNeille completion of uniquely complemented lattice is necessarily uniquely complemented. We show that the MacNeille completion of a uniquely complemented lattice need not be complemented.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Collins Amburo Agyingi ◽  
Paulus Haihambo ◽  
Hans-Peter A. Künzi

We continue our work on endpoints and startpoints inT0-quasimetric spaces. In particular we specialize some of our earlier results to the case of two-valuedT0-quasimetrics, that is, essentially, to partial orders. For instance, we observe that in a complete lattice the startpoints (resp., endpoints) in our sense are exactly the completely join-irreducible (resp., completely meet-irreducible) elements. We also discuss for a partially ordered set the connection between its Dedekind-MacNeille completion and theq-hyperconvex hull of its naturalT0-quasimetric space.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document