Author(s):  
V.A. Lensky ◽  
◽  
A.S. Zhuzhel ◽  
W.G. Umetbaev ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teck Kean Lim ◽  
Aqil Ahmed ◽  
Muhammad Antonia Gibrata ◽  
Gunawan Taslim

Geophysics ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 52 (11) ◽  
pp. 1457-1465 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. F. Laine

Cross‐borehole seismic velocity and high‐frequency electromagnetic (EM) attenuation data were obtained to construct tomographic images of heavy oil sands in a steam‐flood environment. First‐arrival seismic data were used to construct a tomographic color image of a 10 m by 8 m vertical plane between the two boreholes. Two high‐frequency (17 and 15 MHz) EM transmission tomographs were constructed of a 20 m by 8 m vertical plane. The velocity tomograph clearly shows a shale layer with oil sands above it and below it. The EM tomographs show a more complex geology of oil sands with shale inclusions. The deepest EM tomograph shows the upper part of an active steam zone and suggests steam chanelling just below the shale layer. These results show the detailed structure of the entire plane between boreholes and may provide a better means to understand the process for in situ heavy oil recovery in a steam‐flood environment.


Geophysics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry R. Lines ◽  
Kenneth R. Kelly ◽  
John Queen

Layered geological formations with large seismic velocity contrasts can effectively create channel waves in cross‐borehole seismic data. The existence of channel waves for such waveguides can be confirmed by ray tracing, wave equation modeling, and modal analysis. Channel wave arrivals are identified in cross‐borehole data recorded at Conoco’s Newkirk test facility. For these data, where velocity contrasts are about 2 to 1, tomography based on first arrival traveltimes, is limited due to problems with extreme ray bending and seismic shadow zones. However, it may be possible to extract geological information using channel wave information. The seismometer differencing method appears to be a promising approach for detecting waveguide boundaries by use of cross‐borehole data.


2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 434-441
Author(s):  
Don White ◽  
Thomas M. Daley ◽  
Björn Paulsson ◽  
William Harbert

Borehole geophysical methods are a key component of subsurface monitoring of geologic CO2 storage sites because boreholes form a locus where geophysical measurements can be compared directly with the controlling geology. Borehole seismic methods, including intrawell, crosswell, and surface-to-borehole acquisition, are useful for site characterization, surface seismic calibration, 2D/3D time-lapse imaging, and microseismic monitoring. Here, we review the most common applications of borehole seismic methods in the context of storage monitoring and consider the role that detailed geophysical simulations can play in answering questions that arise when designing monitoring plans. Case study examples are included from the multitude of CO2 monitoring projects that have demonstrated the utility of borehole seismic methods for this purpose over the last 20 years.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document