Schedule of Reinforcement

Author(s):  
Mark Groskreutz
1968 ◽  
Vol 78 (3, Pt.1) ◽  
pp. 442-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morton P. Friedman ◽  
Edward C. Carterette ◽  
Norman H. Anderson

1968 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Calvin M. Leung ◽  
Glen D. Jensen ◽  
Richard P. Tapley

2 groups of 60 rats received either 75 or 285 runs in a runway before being given a choice between freeloading from a dish of pellets in the start box or running the maze for a single pellet. The 285-trial Ss showed less willingness to perform the operant than the 75-trial Ss. This is opposite to what Jensen (1963) had found in the Skinner box. Schedule of reinforcement (100 vs 50%) during training did not significantly affect freeloading scores.


1973 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 627-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald D. Lachter

Following 30 sessions of training on a 60-sec. random-interval schedule of reinforcement, 2 pigeons were exposed to a multiple schedule containing non-contingent and variable delay components that provided equal frequencies of reinforcement. The introduction of the multiple schedule resulted in decreased response rare in both components, with a higher rate maintained under the variable delay. Post-reinforcement pauses were systematically increased during the non-contingent schedule, but no systematic increases in pause duration were noted for the variable delay component.


1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Carr ◽  
Janet Carr

Where a behaviour has been maintained on a variable schedule of reinforcement theoretically it should be possible to reduce resistance to extinction by first putting the behaviour onto a continuous schedule of reinforcement. This approach has been employed in animal research but rarely with human participants, and where it has, with little success. This study describes the use of the approach to overcome some minor problems in the behaviour of young children, the problems being sufficiently troublesome for the parents to consult their GP. All the families who used the approach were successful in remediating the behaviour. Some reasons for this success, in contrast with the disappointing outcomes of some of the earlier research, are discussed. Although the study lacks formal controls it is suggested that the approach could be usefully applied to other common childhood behaviours that have been subjected to variable reinforcement.


1995 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Buskist ◽  
R. J. Degrandpre

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document